Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30836989›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2019

Effects of training and support programs for leaders of illness-based support groups: commentary and updated evidence.

Kimberly A Turner, Danielle B Rice, Andrea Carboni-Jiménez, Jill Boruff, Brett D Thombs

Abstract readLetterSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberly A TurnerLady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste Catherine Road, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Danielle B RiceLady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste Catherine Road, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Andrea Carboni-JiménezLady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste Catherine Road, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Jill BoruffSchulich Library of Science and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste Catherine Road, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E4, Canada. brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-8432

Funding

CIHR PJT-156429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer-led support groups play an important role in supporting people with chronic diseases. They may be particularly important for people with rare diseases who typically do not have access to professional support options that focus on their disease-specific needs. Many peer-led support groups in rare diseases, however, are not sustained, and many patients do not have access to support groups. Training and education for peer support group leaders could address barriers to initiating and sustaining groups, but there is little evidence on the effectiveness of support group leader training programs. A previous systematic review evaluated the effects of training programs for peer leaders of support groups for people with medical illness on leader and support group outcomes, but it identified only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared high- and low-resource training programs for cancer support group leaders. The trial did not find evidence that the high-resource program was more effective, but was limited by a small sample size and serious methodological limitations. To meet the needs of people living with the rare autoimmune connective tissue disease scleroderma, the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network has partnered with patient organizations to develop the Scleroderma Support group Leader EDucation Program, and a full-scale RCT to test the effectiveness of the program is planned. To verify the need for such a trial, we updated the previous systematic review. UPDATED EVIDENCE: Review methods for the update were unchanged from the initial review. The updated database search yielded 1504 unique citations in addition to the 9757 assessed for eligibility in the previous review. All additional citations identified in the updated search were excluded at the title and abstract review stage.

conclusionsOur systematic review update found that there is presently insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of training and support programs for peer leaders of disease-based support groups, highlighting the need for well-designed and rigorously conducted RCTs to examine the effects of training for peer leaders of support groups, especially in a rare disease context. The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network's trial of the Scleroderma Support group Leader EDucation Program will serve as such a trial. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018096369.

Indexed as

Education, NonprofessionalHumansLeadershipPeer GroupRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicScleroderma, LocalizedScleroderma, SystemicSelf-Help GroupsLeader training programsPeer leadersPeer supportSupport groupsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30836989
PMCPMC6402093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.