ArticleBMC systems biology2019
LSM-W
Article in BMC systems biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological advances in imaging and modelling of leaf structural traits: a review of heat stress in wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Image-Based Quantitative Analysis of Epidermal Morphology in Wild Potato Leaves.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Particle-Based Imaging Tools Revealing Water Flows in Maize Nodal Vascular Plexus.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Sight on Single-Cell Transcriptomics in Plants Through the Prism of Cell-Based Computational Modeling Approaches: Benefits and Challenges for Data Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Guidelines for Regulated Cell Death Assays: A Systematic Summary, A Categorical Comparison, A Prospective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Comparison of Sample Preparation Techniques for Inspection of Leaf Epidermises Using Light Microscopy and Scanning Electronic Microscopy.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- ImageJ SurfCut: a user-friendly pipeline for high-throughput extraction of cell contours from 3D image stacks.BMC biology · 2019Article
- Systems biology research at BGRS-2018.BMC systems biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroscopic images are widely used in plant biology as an essential source of information on morphometric characteristics of the cells and the topological characteristics of cellular tissue pattern due to modern computer vision algorithms. High-resolution 3D confocal images allow extracting quantitative characteristics describing the cell structure of leaf epidermis. For some issues in the study of cereal leaves development, it is required to apply the staining techniques with fluorescent dyes and to scan rather large fragments consisting of several frames. We aimed to develop a tool for processing multi-frame multi-channel 3D images obtained from confocal laser scanning microscopy and taking into account the peculiarities of the cereal leaves staining.
resultsWe elaborated an ImageJ-plugin LSM-W
conclusionThe proposed plugin is efficient for high-throughput analysis of cellular architecture for cereal leaf epidermis. The workflow implies using inexpensive and rapid sample preparation and does not require the applying of transgenesis and reporter genetic structures expanding the range of species and varieties to study. Obtained characteristics of the cell structure and patterns further could act as a basis for the development and verification for spatial models of plant tissues formation mechanisms accounting for structural features of cereal leaves. AVAILABILITY: The implementation of this workflow is available as an ImageJ plugin distributed as a part of the Fiji project (FijiisjustImageJ: https://fiji.sc/ ). The plugin is freely available at https://imagej.net/LSM_Worker , https://github.com/JmanJ/LSM_Worker and http://pixie.bionet.nsc.ru/LSM_WORKER/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.