Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30836815›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

Are Men Making Informed Decisions According to the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Guidelines? Analysis of the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Dexter L Cooper, Latrice Rollins, Tanesha Slocumb, Brian M Rivers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Associations of Content and Context of Communication with Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Effect of a Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Aid for African-American Men in Primary Care Settings.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dexter L Cooper1 Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Prevention Medicine, Cancer Health Equity Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Latrice Rollins2 Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Prevention Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tanesha Slocumb2 Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Prevention Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brian M Rivers1 Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Prevention Medicine, Cancer Health Equity Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTU54CA118948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Timiya S Nolan · 2005 to 2026
$26.6M
Research Training & Career Development ProgramU54CA118638 · NCI · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Brian M. Rivers · 2005 to 2026
$22.7M
A Health IT based Psychoeducational Intervention for African American Prostate CancerR01MD007783 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RIVERS, BRIAN M. · 2014 to 2019
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA118638NCI NIH HHS U54 CA118948NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening recommendation endorses the opportunity for men to make an informed decision about whether or not to screen. This entails speaking with a provider to discuss the potential advantages, disadvantages, and uncertainties about the PSA screening test. The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the reported level of being informed about the PSA test by race and (b) the association between the receipt of the PSA test and participants reporting that they were informed about the test. U.S. adult males (ages 40-74 years) were identified from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS; n = 3,877). Chi-square analysis assessed bivariate differences among men who received different levels of PSA screening information. Binomial logistic regression models assessed the relationship of race/ethnicity and the receipt of the PSA test on being informed about the PSA test. Over half (54.3%) of the sample had a PSA test and most (72.0%) reported that they did not receive information about both the advantages and disadvantages (being informed) of the PSA test. Black men (40.3%) were significantly most likely to report being informed ( p < .001), and 61.3% reported receipt of a recommendation from their provider ( p < .001). White men (63.1%) were significantly more likely to report receiving the PSA test. Findings indicate that more men reported receiving the PSA test than men who reported being informed about it. Future research and interventions should strive for men of all racial and ethnic backgrounds to be informed about the PSA test before making a decision.

Indexed as

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemDecision MakingAdultAgedEthnicityGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenUnited StatesProstate-Specific Antigenbehavioral researchhealth-care issueshealth communicationhealth disparities/health equityinformed decision-makingoncology/cancerpopulation-basedprostate cancerresearch

Identifiers

PMID30836815
PMCPMC6440290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.