Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30836794›Full record

ArticleChronic respiratory disease

Promoting chronic disease management in persons with complex social needs: A qualitative descriptive study.

Donna Goodridge, Thilina Bandara, Darcy Marciniuk, Shelly Hutchinson, Lois Crossman, Brittany Kachur, Dana Higgins, Andrew Bennett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Caring for high-need patients.BMC health services research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donna Goodridge1 College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-8646
Thilina Bandara1 College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Darcy Marciniuk1 College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Shelly Hutchinson2 Chronic Disease Management Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Lois Crossman2 Chronic Disease Management Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brittany Kachur2 Chronic Disease Management Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Dana Higgins2 Chronic Disease Management Program, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Andrew Bennett1 College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Saskatchewan Health Authority · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there are both ethical and practical imperatives to address health inequity issues related to chronic disease management for persons with social complexity, existing programs often do not appropriately address the needs of these individuals. This leads to low levels of participation in programs, suboptimal chronic disease management, and higher health-care utilization. The aims of this project were to describe the challenges related to availability, accessibility, and acceptability faced by socially complex patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who were eligible, but declined enrollment in a traditional Chronic Disease Management Program (CDMP). Using a qualitative descriptive study approach informed by a health equity lens, interviews with participants, managers, and a focus group with providers were used to gather data addressing the above aims. Qualitative data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's theoretical thematic analysis approach. The ability of participants to manage chronic disease was profoundly influenced by contextual and personal factors, such as poverty, disability, personal attitudes and beliefs (including shame, mistrust, and hopelessness), and barriers inherent in the organization of the health-care system. The existing chronic disease management program did not adequately address the most critical needs of socially complex patients. Challenges with accessibility and acceptability of chronic disease management and health services played important roles in the ways these socially complex participants managed their chronic illness. The individualistic approach to self-management of chronic illness inherent in conventional CDMP can be poorly aligned with the needs, capacity, and circumstances of many socially complex patients. Innovative models of care that promote incremental and guided approaches to enhancing health and improving self-efficacy need further development and evaluation.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ParticipationPovertyTrustAdultAgedCase ManagementDisease ManagementEvidence-Based MedicineExercise TherapyFemaleFocus GroupsHealth EquityHealth LiteracyChronic disease managementCOPDhealth equityqualitative researchsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID30836794
PMCPMC6402059
OpenAlexW2922287021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.