ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2019
Fabrication of Porous Bone Scaffolds Using Alginate and Bioactive Glass.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytotoxicity evaluation, porosity and physicochemical study of bioactive glass nanocomposites for tissue engineering.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Laboratory performance of novel injectable keratin nanoparticle from poultry feathers loaded-alginate composite hydrogel as a pulpotomy filling biomaterial for dentin regeneration.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Sr/Zn-Doped Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Collagen-PLGA Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Porous calcium silicate bioactive material-alginate composite for bone regeneration.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Current and Future Perspectives of Bioactive Glasses as Injectable Material.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Modulation of 3D Bioprintability in Polysaccharide Bioink by Bioglass Nanoparticles and Multiple Metal Ions for Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- Advanced applications of strontium-containing biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Zinc and Strontium-Substituted Bioactive Glass Nanoparticle/Alginate Composites Scaffold for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Strontium doped bioglass incorporated hydrogel-based scaffold for amplified bone tissue regeneration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Accelerated Discovery of the Polymer Blends for Cartilage Repair through Data-Mining Tools and Machine-Learning Algorithm.Polymers · 2022Article
- Biomimetic PLGA/Strontium-Zinc Nano Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Towards Induction of Angiogenesis in Dental Pulp Stem Cells Using Chitosan-Based Hydrogels Releasing Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Nature-Inspired Unconventional Approaches to Develop 3D Bioceramic Scaffolds with Enhanced Regenerative Ability.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- A Review of Bioactive Glass/Natural Polymer Composites: State of the Art.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Biomimetic Aspects of Oral and Dentofacial Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Strontium- and Zinc-Containing Bioactive Glass and Alginates Scaffolds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Creation of Bony Microenvironment with Extracellular Matrix Doped-Bioactive Ceramics to Enhance Osteoblast Behavior and Delivery of Aspartic Acid-Modified BMP-2 Peptides.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
- Oral Bone Tissue Engineering: Advanced Biomaterials for Cell Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porous composite scaffold using an alginate and bioactive glass ICIE16M was synthesized by a simple freeze-drying technique. The scaffold was characterized using compression testing, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray microtomography (XMT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bioactivity of the scaffold was evaluated by its ability to form apatite on its surface in simulated body fluid (SBF). The data collected showed evidence that the novel material produced had an appropriate pore size for osteoconduction, with an average pore size of 110 µm and maximum pore size of 309 µm. Statistical analysis confirmed that the glass filler significantly (P < 0.05) increased the collapse yield of the scaffolds compared with pure alginate scaffolds. The ICIE16M glass had an amorphous structure, favorable for bioactivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.