Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30835970›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2019

Use of the Palliative Performance Scale to estimate survival among home hospice patients with heart failure.

Ruth Masterson Creber, David Russell, Frances Dooley, Lizeyka Jordan, Dawon Baik, Parag Goyal, Scott Hummel, Ellen K Hummel, Kathryn H Bowles

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Corrigendum.ESC heart failure · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth Masterson CreberDivision of Health Informatics, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 East Street, Suite 301, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
David RussellVisiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Frances DooleyVisiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Lizeyka JordanVisiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Dawon BaikColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Parag GoyalDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Scott HummelDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Ellen K HummelDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Kathryn H BowlesUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
VNS Health · USAppalachian State University · USColumbia University · USCornell University · USUniversity of Michigan · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Should we return patient reported outcomes to human subjects participants?-exploring ethical obligationsR00NR016275 · NINR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MASTERSON CREBER, RUTH MARIE · 2018 to 2020
$896k
NINR NIH HHS R00NR016275NINR NIH HHS T32NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEstimating survival is challenging in the terminal phase of advanced heart failure. Patients, families, and health-care organizations would benefit from more reliable prognostic tools. The Palliative Performance Scale Version 2 (PPSv2) is a reliable and validated tool used to measure functional performance; higher scores indicate higher functionality. It has been widely used to estimate survival in patients with cancer but rarely used in patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic cut-points of the PPSv2 for predicting survival among patients with heart failure receiving home hospice care. METHODS AND

resultsThis retrospective cohort study included 1114 adult patients with a primary diagnosis of heart failure from a not-for-profit hospice agency between January 2013 and May 2017. The primary outcome was survival time. A Cox proportional-hazards model and sensitivity analyses were used to examine the association between PPSv2 scores and survival time, controlling for demographic and clinical variables. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to quantify the diagnostic performance of PPSv2 scores by survival time. Lower PPSv2 scores on admission to hospice were associated with decreased median (interquartile range, IQR) survival time [PPSv2 10 = 2 IQR: 1-5 days; PPSv2 20 = 3 IQR: 2-8 days] IQR: 55-207. The discrimination of the PPSv2 at baseline for predicting death was highest at 7 days [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.802], followed by an AUC of 0.774 at 14 days, an AUC of 0.736 at 30 days, and an AUC of 0.705 at 90 days.

conclusionsThe PPSv2 tool can be used by health-care providers for prognostication of hospice-enrolled patients with heart failure who are at high risk of near-term death. It has the greatest utility in patients who have the most functional impairment.

Indexed as

Hospice CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSurvival RateEnd-of-life careHeart failureHospicePalliative carePalliative performance scalePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30835970
PMCPMC6437549
OpenAlexW2919685053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.