ArticleESC heart failure2019
Use of the Palliative Performance Scale to estimate survival among home hospice patients with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Models to Trigger Palliative Care Referrals in Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.CJC open · 2026Review
- Observational
- Determining timeframes to death for imminently dying patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- 'How long do you think?' Unresponsive dying patients in a specialist palliative care service: A consecutive cohort study.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- The interRAI CHESS scale is comparable to the palliative performance scale in predicting 90-day mortality in a palliative home care population.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- [Assessment tools for palliative care needs in patients with heart failure in general practice].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2022Article
- The Development and Implementation of a Cardiac Home Hospice Program: Results of a RE-AIM Analysis.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2020Article
- The Palliative Performance Scale predicts mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Palliative medicine · 2020Observational
- Barriers to Early Utilization of Palliative Care in Heart Failure: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Corrigendum.ESC heart failure · 2019Article
- Use of the Palliative Performance Scale to estimate survival among home hospice patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2019Article
- The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2019
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsEstimating survival is challenging in the terminal phase of advanced heart failure. Patients, families, and health-care organizations would benefit from more reliable prognostic tools. The Palliative Performance Scale Version 2 (PPSv2) is a reliable and validated tool used to measure functional performance; higher scores indicate higher functionality. It has been widely used to estimate survival in patients with cancer but rarely used in patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic cut-points of the PPSv2 for predicting survival among patients with heart failure receiving home hospice care. METHODS AND
resultsThis retrospective cohort study included 1114 adult patients with a primary diagnosis of heart failure from a not-for-profit hospice agency between January 2013 and May 2017. The primary outcome was survival time. A Cox proportional-hazards model and sensitivity analyses were used to examine the association between PPSv2 scores and survival time, controlling for demographic and clinical variables. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to quantify the diagnostic performance of PPSv2 scores by survival time. Lower PPSv2 scores on admission to hospice were associated with decreased median (interquartile range, IQR) survival time [PPSv2 10 = 2 IQR: 1-5 days; PPSv2 20 = 3 IQR: 2-8 days] IQR: 55-207. The discrimination of the PPSv2 at baseline for predicting death was highest at 7 days [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.802], followed by an AUC of 0.774 at 14 days, an AUC of 0.736 at 30 days, and an AUC of 0.705 at 90 days.
conclusionsThe PPSv2 tool can be used by health-care providers for prognostication of hospice-enrolled patients with heart failure who are at high risk of near-term death. It has the greatest utility in patients who have the most functional impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.