Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30835781›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

β-blockers after acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide population-based observational study.

Tse-Hsuan Su, Shang-Hung Chang, Chang-Fu Kuo, Pi-Hua Liu, Yi-Ling Chan

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metoprolol for the Prevention of Acute Exacerbations of COPD.The New England journal of medicine · 2019
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Appraisal of β-Blocker Use in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The safety of cardioselective βERJ open research · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Beta-Blockers: A Tale of Triumphs, Trials, and Tribulations.International journal of applied & basic medical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tse-Hsuan SuDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shang-Hung ChangDepartments of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang-Fu KuoDepartments of Rheumatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Pi-Hua LiuClinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yi-Ling ChanDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) less often receive β-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This may influence their outcomes after AMI. This study evaluated the efficacy of β-blockers after AMI in patients with COPD, compared with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NDCCBs) and absence of these two kinds of treatment. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using data retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We collected 28,097 patients with COPD who were hospitalized for AMI between January 2004 and December 2013. After hospital discharge, 24,056 patients returned to outpatient clinics within 14 days (the exposure window). Those who received both β-blockers and NDCCBs (n = 302) were excluded, leaving 23,754 patients for analysis. Patients were classified into the β-blocker group (n = 10,638, 44.8%), the NDCCB group, (n = 1,747, 7.4%) and the control group (n = 11,369, 47.9%) based on their outpatient prescription within the exposure window. The β-blockers group of patients had lower overall mortality risks (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.91 [0.83-0.99] versus the NDCCB group; 0.88 [0.84-0.93] versus the control group), but the risk of major adverse cardiac events within 1 year was not statistically different. β-blockers decreased risks of re-hospitalization for COPD and other respiratory diseases by 12-32%.

conclusionsThe use of β-blockers after AMI was associated with a reduced mortality risk in patients with COPD. β-blockers did not increase the risk of COPD exacerbations.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedCalcium Channel BlockersCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRetrospective StudiesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCalcium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID30835781
PMCPMC6400336
OpenAlexW2919275953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.