ArticlePloS one2019
An anatomical study on lumbar arteries related to the extrapedicular approach applied during lumbar PVP (PKP).
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adverse events associated with basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: A comprehensive analysis from the MAUDE database.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Extrapedicular approach for basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a conceptual review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Unilateral extrapedicular vs. bilateral transpedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- FACTFINDERS for PATIENT SAFETY: Minimizing complications in radiofrequency neurotomy: Part I-Implantable devices; Part II-Preprocedural BVNRFN imaging.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical robot-guided unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty: anatomical features and clinical efficacy of a modified transverse process-pedicle approach.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The new clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies serves as a vital reference for surgical management: a retrospective case-control study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- A novel puncture approach via point "O" for percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with L4 or L5 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A modified trajectory of kyphoplastyFrontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- Modified extrapedicular kyphoplasty for the treatment of lumbar compression fracture: Case report and technical note.Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To observe the regional anatomy of the lumbar artery (LA) associated with the extrapedicular approach applied during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), we collected 78 samples of abdominal computed tomography angiography imaging data. We measured the nearest distance from the center of the vertebral body puncture point to the LA (distance VBPP-LA, DVBPP-LA). According to the DVBPP-LA, four zones, Zone I, Zone II, Zone III and Zone IV, were identified. LAs that passed through these zones were called Type I, Type II, Type III and Type IV LAs, respectively. A portion of the lumbar vertebrae had an intersegmental branch that originated from the upper segmental LA and extended longitudinally across the lateral wall of the pedicle; it was called Type V LA. Compared with the DVBPP-LA in L1, L2, L3 and L4, the overall difference and between-group differences were significant (P < 0.05). In L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5, there were 8, 4, 4, 0 and 1 Type I LAs, respectively. There were no Type V LAs in L1 and L2, but there were 2, 16 and 26 Type V LAs in L3, L4 and L5, respectively. In L1-L5, the numbers of Type I LA plus Type V LA were 8, 4, 6, 16 and 27, and the presence ratios were 5.1%, 2.6%, 5.6%, 10.3% and 17.3%, respectively. In L4 and L5, the male presence ratios of Type I LA plus Type V LA were 7.1% and 10.7%, respectively, and the female presence ratios were 13.9% and 25.0%, respectively. Thus, extrapedicular PVP (PKP) in lumbar vertebrae had a risk of LA injury and was not suggested for use in L4 and L5, especially in female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.