Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30835733›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Diel periodicity and visual cues guide oviposition behavior in Phlebotomus papatasi, vector of old-world cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Tatsiana Shymanovich, Lindsey Faw, Nima Hajhashemi, Jimmie Teague, Coby Schal, Loganathan Ponnusamy, Charles S Apperson, Eduardo Hatano, Gideon Wasserberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Luring the vector: A systematic review of sand fly attractants.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Spatial Bet Hedging in Sand Fly Oviposition: Factors Affecting Skip Oviposition inVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tatsiana ShymanovichDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Bldg., Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-7381
Lindsey FawDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Bldg., Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nima HajhashemiDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Bldg., Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jimmie TeagueDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Bldg., Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.
Coby SchalDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Loganathan PonnusamyDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Charles S AppersonDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Eduardo HatanoDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Gideon WasserbergDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 235 Eberhart Bldg., Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0366-8359

Funding

Oviposition attractants for sand fly controlR01AI123327 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI WASSERBERG, GIDEON · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhlebotomine sand flies are vectors of human leishmaniases, important neglected tropical diseases. In this study, we investigated diel patterns of oviposition behavior, effects of visual cues on oviposition-site selection, and whether these affect the attraction of gravid Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli), the vector of old-world cutaneous leishmaniasis, to olfactory cues from oviposition sites. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo evaluate these questions, we conducted a series of experiments using attraction and oviposition assays within free-flight test chambers containing gravid females entrained under a 14:10 hrs light:dark photoperiod. By replacing sticky-screens or moist filter papers every three hours, we showed that oviposition site search occurs mainly in the latest part of the night whereas peak oviposition occurs during the early part of the night. Behavioral responses to olfactory oviposition cues are regulated by time-of-day and can be disrupted by transient exposure to a constant darkness photoperiod. Gravid females, but not any other stage, age, or sex, were attracted to dark, round oviposition jars, possibly resembling rodent burrow openings. This visual attraction disappeared in the absence of an illumination source. Egg deposition rate was not affected by jar color. Olfactory cues had the strongest effect when the visual cues were minimal. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our study showed, for the first time, that visual cues in the form of oviposition-site color, lighting level, and photoperiod are important in guiding the oviposition behavior of phlebotomine sand flies. Furthermore, such visual cues could modify the flies' sensitivity to olfactory oviposition cues. Our results suggest that chemosensory and visual cues are complementary, with visual cues used to orient gravid females towards oviposition sites, possibly at long- to medium-ranges during crepuscular periods, while olfactory cues are used to approach the burrow in darkness and assess its suitability at close-range. Implications to sand fly control are discussed.

Indexed as

OvipositionPhotoperiodAnimalsCircadian ClocksColorFemaleHumansInsect ControlInsect VectorsLeishmaniasisPhlebotomusSex AttractantsSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID30835733
PMCPMC6420040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.