ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2019
Causes and impact on survival of underuse of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in heart failure.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on long-term hospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Renal effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a real life 1-year follow-up study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but these medications are underprescribed in clinical practice. We reviewed the records of HF patients receiving a first visit in a tertiary outpatient clinic from January 1st 2004 to May 31st 2015, and selected those with a serum creatinine concentration (sCr) available at both the first and last visit and < 3.5 mg/dL at baseline, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% at the first visit. Of 570 eligible patients, 92 (16.1%) never received ACEi/ARB. Compared to ACEi/ARB users, never-users were older, more often women, had higher sCr and lower systolic blood pressure, were less commonly on beta-blocker, and had more frequently anemia. Current or prior cancer also tended to be more common in ACEi/ARB never-users. ACEi/ARB users displayed an improvement in LVEF by ≥ 10% of the baseline value more often than ACEi/ARB never-users (33.7% vs. 20.7%, respectively, P = 0.01), whereas no difference in percent variation of sCr levels was found between the two groups (8.2% vs. 3.1%, respectively; P = 0.13). Over a median follow-up of 56 months (range 1-137 months), 215 (37.7%) patients died. After multiple adjustments, ACEi/ARB never-use was associated with an almost twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.39-2.80). ACEi/ARB underuse in HFrEF is a standing issue with dramatic prognostic consequences. Efforts are needed to eliminate perceived contraindications to these drugs and ensure their implementation in real-life cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.