ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2019
Lead Time Bias May Contribute to the Shorter Life Expectancy in Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of colorectal cancer screening programme on survival and employment in Taiwan: A nationwide analysis of real-world data.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Global elective breast- and colorectal cancer surgery performance backlogs, attributable mortality and implemented health system responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe long-term outcomes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer have varied in previous studies. Our nationwide cohort analysis estimated expected years of life lost to adjust for lead time bias.
aimWe recalculated the long-term outcomes for post-colonoscopy and detected colorectal cancer.
methodsPatients with colorectal cancer registered in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between 2002 and 2009 were enrolled. The detected group included 22,169 cases of colorectal cancer confirmed within 6 months after a colonoscopy. The post-colonoscopy group included 1653 cancer patients who received a colonoscopy 6-60 months before diagnosis. Patients were followed up until 2011. We simulated age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched referents from life tables in the Taiwan National Vital Statistics using a Monte Carlo method. The life expectancy and expected years of life lost of the cancer patients were obtained from extrapolation of the logit transformation of the survival ratio between the cancer cohorts and the referent groups.
resultsPost-colonoscopy colorectal cancer had shorter life expectancies than detected cancer (stages 2-4: 13.6 vs. 16.1 years; 8.7 vs. 12.6 years; 2.1 vs. 4.1 years, p < 0.001). The loss-of-life expectancy did not show this trend after adjusting for lead time bias. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer was found at an older age, more often proximal, and was associated with previous endoscopic polypectomy procedures (p < 0.001).
conclusionsPost-colonoscopy colorectal cancer leads to a shorter life expectancy, which appears partially explained by the presence of lead time bias. Quality assurance for colonoscopy and close surveillance for high risk groups would reduce post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.