Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30835004›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2019

Pavlov's Pain: the Effect of Classical Conditioning on Pain Perception and its Clinical Implications.

Libo Zhang, Xuejing Lu, Yanzhi Bi, Li Hu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Placebo and nocebo effect in pain.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The microbiota-microglia axis in central nervous system disorders.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. High and Mighty? Cannabinoids and the microbiome in pain.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Libo ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuejing LuCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. luxj@psych.ac.cn.
Yanzhi BiCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Li HuCAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. huli@psych.ac.cn.
Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIt has been known for decades that classical conditioning influences pain perception. However, the precise relationship between conditioning and pain remains unclear. In addition, the clinical implications of their relationship are vastly underappreciated. Thus, we aim to (a) examine how conditioning increases or decreases pain sensitivity, (b) assess how conditioning contributes to the development and maintenance of chronic pain, and (c) explore strategies to utilize conditioning to optimize pain treatment. RECENT

findingsWe first review studies regarding how classical conditioning alters pain perception with an emphasis on two phenomena where conditioning increases pain sensitivity (i.e., conditioned hyperalgesia) or decreases it (i.e., conditioned hypoalgesia). Specifically, we critically examine empirical studies about conditioned hyperalgesia and conditioned hypoalgesia, explore reasons why conditioning leads to these two seemingly opposite phenomena, and discuss the neural mechanisms behind them. We then highlight how conditioning contributes to the development and maintenance of chronic pain, and present neuroscientific evidence for maladaptive aversive conditioning in chronic pain patients. Moreover, we propose a framework for understanding how to exploit conditioning to optimize pain treatment, including minimizing conditioned hyperalgesia, maximizing conditioned hypoalgesia, and eliminating excessive fear and overgeneralization in chronic pain. Classical conditioning profoundly modulates the experience of pain and affects the development and maintenance of chronic pain. The relationship between them has far-reaching clinical implications in pain treatment. Further investigations should tackle crucial issues in previous studies, including the complex relationship between conditioning and explicit expectation, and a lack of relevant clinical studies. Resolving these issues, future research would advance our understanding of the nature of pain, help relieve the suffering of patients, and thus contribute to promoting human flourishing.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalHumansPain PerceptionChronic painClassical conditioningClinical implicationsConditioned hyperalgesiaConditioned hypoalgesia

Identifiers

PMID30835004
OpenAlexW2919522332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.