ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019
Novel Imaging in Detection of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Review
- Review
- A Genuinely Hybrid, Multiscale 3D Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Modelling Framework.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Identification of a serum biomarker signature associated with metastatic prostate cancer.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2021Article
- Radiation Therapy in the Definitive Management of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The Johns Hopkins Experience.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019Article
- Traditional and novel imaging modalities for advanced prostate cancer: A critical review.Urology annalsReview
- Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Acute Quadriplegia: A Diagnostic Pitfall.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to highlight the limitations of current standard-of-care prostate cancer (PCa) imaging and discuss novel clinical imaging in advanced disease. RECENT
findingsPCa staging through imaging is important for proper selections in clinical treatment. Traditional imaging techniques for metastatic disease (i.e., computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and radionuclide bone scan) have suboptimal performance in early recurrent or metastatic disease. Novel positron emission tomography agents including radiolabeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), choline, and anti-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.