ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: a review.
Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing future landslide susceptibility and risk escalations under changing LULC and climate conditions in the Western Ghats of Karnataka in India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-resolution land use/cover forecasts for Switzerland in the 21st century.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing farmland suitability for agricultural machinery in land consolidation schemes in hilly terrain in China: A machine learning approach.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Analysis of the Future Evolution of Biocapacity and Landscape Characteristics in the Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Spatial-Temporal Changes and Simulation of Land Use in Metropolitan Areas: A Case of the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Land Use Change Simulation in Rapid Urbanizing Regions: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- An integrated approach of logistic-MCE-CA-Markov to predict the land use structure and their micro-spatial characteristics analysis in Wuhan metropolitan area, Central China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Refining national greenhouse gas inventories.Ambio · 2020Article
- Improving land-use change modeling by integrating ANN with Cellular Automata-Markov Chain model.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Multitemporal time series analysis using machine learning models for ground deformation in the Erhai region, China.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Article
- Exploring ecosystem carbon storage change and scenario simulation in the Qiantang River source region of China.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatio-temporal land-use change modeling, simulation, and prediction have become one of the critical issues in the last three decades due to uncertainty, structure, flexibility, accuracy, the ability for improvement, and the capability for integration of available models. Therefore, many types of models such as dynamic, statistical, and machine learning (ML) models have been used in the geographic information system (GIS) environment to fulfill the high-performance requirements of land-use modeling. This paper provides a literature review on models for modeling, simulating, and predicting land-use change to determine the best approach that can realistically simulate land-use changes. Therefore, the general characteristics of conventional and ML models for land-use change are described, and the different techniques used in the design of these models are classified. The strengths and weaknesses of the various dynamic, statistical, and ML models are determined according to the analysis and discussion of the characteristics of these models. The results of the review confirm that ML models are the most powerful models for simulating land-use change because they can include all driving forces of land-use change in the simulation process and simulate linear and non-linear phenomena, which dynamic models and statistical models are unable to do. However, ML models also have limitations. For instance, some ML models are complex, the simulation rules cannot be changed, and it is difficult to understand how ML models work in a system. However, this can be solved via the use of programming languages such as Python, which in turn improve the simulation capabilities of the ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30834982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.