Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834818›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2020

Improving Understanding and Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury Using Bidirectional Translational Research.

William M Armstead, Monica S Vavilala

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William M ArmsteadDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Monica S VavilalaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pediatrics, and Neurological Surgery, and Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Pressor Choice Influences Protection Of Autoregulation in Brain InjuryR01NS090998 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARMSTEAD, WILLIAM M · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Vasoactive Agents and Cerebral Outcomes in Brain InjuryR21NS095321 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VAVILALA, MONICA S · 2015 to 2016
$462k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090998NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS095321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have failed to demonstrate therapeutic effects even when there appears to be good evidence for efficacy in one or more appropriate pre-clinical models. While existing animal models mimic the injury, difficulties in translating promising therapeutics are exacerbated by the lack of alignment of discrete measures of the underlying injury pathology between the animal models and human subjects. To address this mismatch, we have incorporated reverse translation of bedside experience to inform pre-clinical studies in a large animal (pig) model of TBI that mirror practical clinical assessments. Cerebral autoregulation is impaired after TBI, contributing to poor outcome. Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is often normalized by use of vasoactive agents to increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) and thereby limit impairment of cerebral autoregulation and neurological deficits. Vasoactive agents clinically used to elevate MAP to increase CPP after TBI, such as phenylephrine (Phe), dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (EPI), however, have not been compared sufficiently regarding effect on CPP, autoregulation, and survival after TBI, and clinically, current vasoactive agent use is variable. The cerebral effects of these clinically commonly used vasoactive agents are not known. This review will emphasize pediatric work and will describe bidirectional translational studies using a more human-like animal model of TBI to identify better therapeutic strategies to improve outcome post-injury. These studies in addition investigated the mechanism(s) involved in improvement of outcome in the setting of TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceSwineagebrain injurycerebral autoregulationhistopathologysexsignal transductionvasopressor

Identifiers

PMID30834818
PMCPMC7698848
OpenAlexW2920677937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.