ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06779695 (Prediction of Systemic Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Factor Xa Inhibitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prediction of Systemic Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Factor Xa Inhibitor (Apixaban, Rivaroxaban) by Echocardiographic Parameters: Prospective Observational Study (AF-ECHO Study)
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Recommendations for the safe use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cirrhosis based on a systematic review of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Guideline
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Cirrhotic Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Update of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023Pooled it
- [Comparison of efficacy and safety between new oral anticoagulants and traditional anticoagulants in patients with liver cirrhosis requiring anticoagulant therapy].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Disease: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Pooled it
- Real-world use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: A meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- DOACs reduce risk for new-onset portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation: A retrospective cohort study.Medicine · 2026Article
- When Atrial Fibrillation Meets Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis: Can Direct Oral Anticoagulants Bridge the Therapeutic Gap?Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Medical Costs and Productivity Losses of Atrial Fibrillation Among US Privately Insured Employees.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Real-World Cohort Study.Cardiorenal medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025Review
- Anticoagulants in cirrhosis: main concerns.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Article
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2024Review
- Bleeding Complications of Anticoagulation Therapy in Clinical Practice-Epidemiology and Management: Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Review
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Patients With Cirrhosis and Atrial Fibrillation : A Nationwide Cohort Study.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Liver cirrhotic patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been excluded from randomized clinical studies regarding oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. Whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) are superior to warfarin for these patients remains unclear. Methods and Results This nationwide retrospective cohort study, with data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, enrolled 2428 liver cirrhotic patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking apixaban (n=171), dabigatran (n=535), rivaroxaban (n=732), or warfarin (n=990) from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. We used propensity score-based stabilized weights to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed until the occurrence of an event or the end date of study. The NOAC group (n=1438) showed risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage comparable to that of the warfarin group (n=990) after adjustment. The NOAC group showed significantly lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.79]; P=0.0030) and all major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.74]; P=0.0003) compared with warfarin group. Overall, 90% (n=1290) of patients were taking a low-dose NOAC (apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 10-15 mg daily, or dabigatran 110 mg twice daily). The subgroup analysis indicated that both dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed lower risk of all major bleeding than warfarin. The advantage of lower gastrointestinal and all major bleeding with NOACs over warfarin is contributed by those subgroups with either nonalcoholic or nonadvanced liver cirrhosis. Conclusions NOACs have a risk of thromboembolism comparable to that of warfarin and a lower risk of major bleeding among liver cirrhotic Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Consequently, thromboprophylaxis with low-dose NOAC s may be considered for such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.