Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834622›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2019

Development and validation of a novel prognostic score to predict survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS).

N Marschner, M Frank, W Vach, E Ladda, A Karcher, S Winter, M Jänicke, T Trarbach

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00910819 (Prospective and Retrospective Observation of the Adjuvant and Palliative Treatment Strategies in the Therapy of Colorectal Cancer in Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00910819 completednot on this map

Prospective and Retrospective Observation of the Adjuvant and Palliative Treatment Strategies in the Therapy of Colorectal Cancer in Germany

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsoriOMEDICO AGRan2006 to 2022Enrolled7,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N MarschnerPraxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-1301
M FrankBiostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
W VachDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
E LaddaOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Neumarkt, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany.
A KarcherOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Heidelberg, Germany.
S WinterClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
M JänickeClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
T TrarbachMVZ des Klinikums Wilhelmshaven, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.

Funding

AmgenBayermedac GmbHMerck Pharma GmbH/Merck Serono GmbHOnkovis GmbHPfizerRoche AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPublished prognostic scores for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are based on data from highly selected patient subgroups with specified first-line treatments and may not be applicable to routine practice. We have therefore developed and validated the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) to predict overall survival (OS) for patients with mCRC.

methodA total of 1704 patients from the prospective, multicentre cohort study Tumour Registry Colorectal Cancer were separated into learning (n = 796) and validation (n = 908) samples. Using a multivariate Cox regression model, the six-factor mCCS was established.

resultsThe six independent prognostic factors for survival are as follows: two or more metastatic sites at the start of first-line treatment, tumour grading ≥ G3 at primary diagnosis, residual tumour classification ≥ R1/unknown, lymph node ratio (of primary tumour) ≥ 0.4, tumour stage ≥ III/unknown at primary diagnosis and KRAS status mutated/unknown. The mCCS clearly separated the learning sample into three risk groups: zero to two factors (low risk), three factors (intermediate risk) and four to six factors (high risk). The prognostic performance of the mCCS was confirmed in the validation sample and additionally stratified a large sample of patients with known (K)RAS mutation status.

conclusionThe novel prognostic score, mCCS, clearly defines three prognostic groups for OS at start of first-line therapy. For oncologists, the mCCS represents a simple and easy-to-apply tool for routine clinical use, as it is based on objective tumour characteristics and can assist with treatment decision-making and communication of the prognosis to patients.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGermanyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesRegistriesReproducibility of Resultscohort studiesColorectal neoplasmsprognosisrisk assessmentsurvival

Identifiers

PMID30834622
PMCPMC6850201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.