ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2019
Development and validation of a novel prognostic score to predict survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS).
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00910819 (Prospective and Retrospective Observation of the Adjuvant and Palliative Treatment Strategies in the Therapy of Colorectal Cancer in Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective and Retrospective Observation of the Adjuvant and Palliative Treatment Strategies in the Therapy of Colorectal Cancer in Germany
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective, longitudinal oncology registries enabling advanced real-world evidence: the iOMEDICO experience.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Prospective validation of the modified metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in >600 patients with RAS-wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Final results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Novel tumor marker index combining carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9: New prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Changes in survival of >3800 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Germany: results from a 16-year prospective longitudinal real-world data analysis.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024Article
- FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A novel validated prognostic score to facilitate treatment decision-making in real-world.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Association of Disease Progression With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults With Breast, Lung, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimPublished prognostic scores for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are based on data from highly selected patient subgroups with specified first-line treatments and may not be applicable to routine practice. We have therefore developed and validated the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) to predict overall survival (OS) for patients with mCRC.
methodA total of 1704 patients from the prospective, multicentre cohort study Tumour Registry Colorectal Cancer were separated into learning (n = 796) and validation (n = 908) samples. Using a multivariate Cox regression model, the six-factor mCCS was established.
resultsThe six independent prognostic factors for survival are as follows: two or more metastatic sites at the start of first-line treatment, tumour grading ≥ G3 at primary diagnosis, residual tumour classification ≥ R1/unknown, lymph node ratio (of primary tumour) ≥ 0.4, tumour stage ≥ III/unknown at primary diagnosis and KRAS status mutated/unknown. The mCCS clearly separated the learning sample into three risk groups: zero to two factors (low risk), three factors (intermediate risk) and four to six factors (high risk). The prognostic performance of the mCCS was confirmed in the validation sample and additionally stratified a large sample of patients with known (K)RAS mutation status.
conclusionThe novel prognostic score, mCCS, clearly defines three prognostic groups for OS at start of first-line therapy. For oncologists, the mCCS represents a simple and easy-to-apply tool for routine clinical use, as it is based on objective tumour characteristics and can assist with treatment decision-making and communication of the prognosis to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.