Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834354›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Trial design for assessing analytical and clinical performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays in the United States: The HIGH-US study.

R H Christenson, W F Peacock, F S Apple, A T Limkakeng, R M Nowak, J McCord, C R deFilippi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes in ED patients with non-specific ECG findings and low high-sensitivity troponin.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R H ChristensonUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
W F PeacockDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
F S AppleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center of Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
A T LimkakengDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
R M NowakHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
J McCordHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
C R deFilippiInova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays have been developed that quantify lower cTnI concentrations with better precision versus earlier generation assays. hs-cTnI assays allow improved clinical utility for diagnosis and risk stratification in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute myocardial infarction. We describe the High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assays in the United States (HIGH-US) study design used to conduct studies for characterizing the analytical and clinical performance of hs-cTnI assays, as required by the US Food and Drug Administration for a 510(k) clearance application. This study was non-interventional and therefore it was not registered at clinicaltrials.gov.

methodsWe conducted analytic studies utilizing Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidance that included limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, linearity, within-run and between run imprecision and reproducibility as well as potential interferences and high dose hook effect. A sample set collected from healthy females and males was used to determine the overall and sex-specific cTnI 99th percentile upper reference limits (URL). The total coefficient of variation at the female 99th percentile URL and a universally available American Association for Clinical Chemistry sample set (AACC Universal Sample Bank) from healthy females and males was used to examine high-sensitivity (hs) performance of the cTnI assays. Clinical diagnosis of enrolled subjects was adjudicated by expert cardiologists and emergency medicine physicians. Assessment of temporal diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were determined at presentation and collection times thereafter. The prognostic performance at one-year after presentation to the emergency department was also performed. This design is appropriate to describe analytical characterization and clinical performance, and allows for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis and risk assessment.

Indexed as

99th percentileACS, acute coronary syndromeAMI, acute myocardial infarctionAnalytical characteristicsClinical performanceCLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstitutecTn, cardiac troponincTnI, cardiac troponin IHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponinhs-cTn, high-sensitivity cardiac troponinhs-cTnI, High-Sensitivity Troponin IIM, immunoassayImmunoassayLi-Hep, lithium heparinLoB, Limit of BlankLoD, Limit of DetectionLoQ, Limit of QuantitationMDP, Medical Decision PoolsNPV, negative predictive valuePPV, positive predictive valueSex-specific 99th percentile cutoffsURL, upper reference limit

Identifiers

PMID30834354
PMCPMC6384326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.