ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2019
Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self-expandable metal stent using side- and forward-viewing endoscope: Feasibility and outcome.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic duodenal stent versus endoscopic or surgical gastrojejunostomy to treat malignant gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Duodenal Obstruction: The Papilla of Vater as a Landmark.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- The Great View Forward: The Use of a Colonoscope for Distal Duodenal Stent Placement.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS), an alternative to surgical bypass for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), is commonly performed using a forward-viewing endoscope with a wide therapeutic channel; however, due to limited availability, most Indian centers use a side-viewing duodenoscope. We studied the feasibility and outcome of SEMS placement using side- and forward-viewing endoscopes.
methodData of patients undergoing SEMS placement using side- and forward-viewing endoscopes with a therapeutic channel for the palliation of malignant GOO presenting during a 5-year period were analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up data were obtained from records and telephonic interviews, and technical and clinical success, complications, and survival were evaluated.
resultsOf 114 patients (age 56.5 ± 11.6 years, 59 [52%] female), 90 (79%) and 24 (21%) underwent SEMS placement using side- and forward-viewing endoscopes, respectively. Technical (89, 98.9% vs. 24, 100%,
conclusionAlthough side- and forward-viewing endoscopes are equally effective for antroduodenal SEMS placement, the procedure can be performed faster using the latter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.