Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834340›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2019

Significance of ileal and/or cecal wall thickening on abdominal computed tomography in a tropical country.

Amit Kumar, Surinder S Rana, Ritambhra Nada, Naveen Kalra, Ravi K Sharma, Usha Dutta, Rajesh Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combination of antimicrobials for non-specific isolated terminal ileal abnormalities - A randomized clinical trial.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ileocecal thickening: Clinical approach to a common problem.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit KumarDepartment of Gastroenterology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.
Surinder S RanaDepartment of Gastroenterology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-9380
Ritambhra NadaDepartment of Histopathology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.
Naveen KalraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.
Ravi K SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.
Usha DuttaDepartment of Gastroenterology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.
Rajesh GuptaDepartment of Surgery Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimClinical significance of ileocecal thickening on computed tomography (CT) is uncertain. We conducted this prospective study to determine the clinical relevance of ileal and/or cecal thickening on CT.

methodsAll patients with ileocecal thickening on CT were prospectively evaluated with ileocolonoscopy, biopsy, and other relevant investigations.

resultsFifty patients (29 males, mean age 36.8 ± 13.21 years) were studied. Thirty nine (78%) patients presented with abdominal pain. On CT, 46 (92%) had a thickened wall of terminal ileum, 25 (50%) cecum, and 21 (42%) of both cecum and ileum. The mean wall thickness of ileum and cecum on CT was 7.23 + 3.2 mm and 5.5 + 3.1 mm, respectively. Final diagnosis was tuberculosis in 24 (48%) patients, Crohn's disease (CD) in 10 (20%), and adenocarcinoma in 1 patient. Colonoscopy demonstrated abnormal findings in 41 patients (82% patients with mucosal ulcerations being most common (

conclusionA majority of patients with ileocecal wall thickening on CT have an underlying disease and should be further investigated by ileocolonoscopy and biopsy.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomacolonoscopycomputed tomographyCrohn's diseasetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID30834340
PMCPMC6386737
OpenAlexW2897035168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.