Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834338›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2019

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis.

Sarthak Malik, Kusum Sharma, Kim Vaiphei, Narendra Dhaka, Neha Berry, Pankaj Gupta, Megha Sharma, Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Rakesh Kochhar, Saroj K Sinha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gastrointestinal tuberculosis: A systematic review of epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarthak MalikDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.
Kusum SharmaDepartment of Medical Microbiology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.
Kim VaipheiDepartment of Histopathology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.
Narendra DhakaDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.
Neha BerryDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.
Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-3757
Megha SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.
Bipadabhanjan MallickDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-6947
Rakesh KochharDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4077-6474
Saroj K SinhaDepartment of Gastroenterology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-9935
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTo evaluate the role of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GITB).

methodsThis was a prospective observational study conducted from July 2015 to November 2016 at a tertiary care teaching institution in north India. Fifty individuals with clinically suspected GITB and older than 18 years of age were recruited. Patients underwent radiological investigations, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or colonoscopy as clinically indicated. Multiple biopsies for tissue diagnosis and PCR were taken. All specimens were subjected to Ziehl Neelsen staining, histopathology, and multiplex PCR using specific primers for genes IS6110, MPB64, and Protein b. The performance of the assay was assessed using a composite reference standard for diagnosis of tuberculosis. It comprised a combination of clinical characteristics and microbiological methods, including smear, Bactenecin (BACTEC) culture, histopathology, and response to antitubercular therapy.

resultsA final diagnosis of tuberculosis was made in 32 cases (Duodenal-4, Ileo-colonic-28). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of histopathology for the diagnosis of tuberculosis was 28.12, 100, 100, and 43.9%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture for the diagnosis of tuberculosis was 9.3, 100, 100, and 38.29%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of tuberculosis was 87.5, 100, 100, and 86.2%, respectively.

conclusionMultiplex PCR using specific primers for genes IS6110, MPB64, and Protein b had a higher sensitivity compared to conventional techniques for the diagnosis of GITB.

Indexed as

colonoscopygastrointestinal tuberculosisgranulomamultiplex PCR

Identifiers

PMID30834338
PMCPMC6386748
OpenAlexW2896022364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.