Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834276›Full record

Observational studyBioMed research international2019

Ectoine-Containing Inhalation Solution versus Saline Inhalation Solution in the Treatment of Acute Bronchitis and Acute Respiratory Infections: A Prospective, Controlled, Observational Study.

Binh-Hai Tran, Van-Anh Dao, Andreas Bilstein, Klaus Unfried, Kija Shah-Hosseini, Ralph Mösges

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patient-reported outcome measures for paediatric acute lower respiratory infection studies.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  3. Targeting the EGFR-ERK axis using the compatible solute ectoine to stabilize CFTR mutant F508del.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Binh-Hai TranInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Van-Anh DaoInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Andreas BilsteinBitop AG, Carlo-Schmid-Allee 5, 44263 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-2520
Klaus UnfriedIUF Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Auf'm Hennekamp 50, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Kija Shah-HosseiniInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-6942
Ralph MösgesInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1928-810X
University of Cologne · DELeibniz Institute of Environmental Medicine · DESchmid (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated an inhalation solution containing ectoine, a bacterial-derived extremolyte, for the treatment of acute bronchitis and acute respiratory infections in comparison with saline inhalation solution.

methodsThis prospective, controlled, observational study comprised an inclusion visit (day 1), a final visit (day 7), and a follow-up questionnaire (day 17). The treatment itself was administered from day 1 to day 7. The Bronchitis Severity Score, patients' general health, general effectiveness of the treatment, tolerability, and adverse events were compared between two groups.

resultsIn total, 135 patients were recruited; 79 patients received ectoine inhalation solution and 56 saline inhalation solution. After treatment, symptom scores decreased significantly in both groups (

conclusionsEctoine inhalation solution seems to be slightly more effective than saline inhalation solution for the treatment of acute bronchitis and acute respiratory infections.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmino Acids, DiaminoBronchitisChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Tract InfectionsSaline SolutionAmino Acids, DiaminoectoineSaline Solution

Identifiers

PMID30834276
PMCPMC6374829
OpenAlexW2912463236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.