Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834231›Full record

ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2019

Comparison of postoperative pain intensity after using reciprocating and continuous rotary glide path systems: a randomized clinical trial.

Mehmet Adıgüzel, Koray Yılmaz, Pelin Tüfenkçi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet AdıgüzelDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-6264
Koray YılmazDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-7385
Pelin TüfenkçiDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9881-5395
Mustafa Kemal University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain intensity after root canal treatment with One G (OG) vs. R-Pilot (RP) files used for glide path preparation. MATERIALS AND

methodsNinety-three single-canaled mandibular premolar teeth with asymptomatic non-vital pulp were randomly assigned into 3 groups (

resultsIn all 3 groups, postoperative pain decreased significantly at each time interval (

conclusionsThe OG group had less postoperative pain than the WGP group in the first 24 hours. The OG and RP systems were similar regarding postoperative pain intensity and analgesic intake.

Indexed as

EndodonticsPostoperative painRoot Canal Treatment

Identifiers

PMID30834231
PMCPMC6387895
OpenAlexW2911291257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.