Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30834173›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet.

Kathleen Vancleef, Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza, Craig Sharp, Gareth Slack, Carla Black, Therese Casanova, Jess Hugill, Sheima Rafiq, James Burridge, Vito Puyat and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04606355 (Autostereoscopic Dynamic Near Vision Testing of Acuity, Stereo and Color on PDI Check), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04606355 suspendednot on this map

Autostereoscopic Dynamic Near Vision Testing of Acuity, Stereo and Color on PDI Check

TypeobservationalSponsorAlaska Blind Child DiscoveryRan2017 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsVisual Suppression, Amblyopia, Color Vision DefectsArmsVisual Acuity, stereopsis, Color vision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Differences in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities reduce with practice.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of stereoacuity with a digital mobile application.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  14. Fixational stability as a measure for the recovery of visual function in amblyopia.Proceedings. Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen VancleefInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ignacio Serrano-PedrazaFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, Madrid, Spain.
Craig SharpSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, 1 Science Square, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gareth SlackSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, 1 Science Square, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Carla BlackInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Therese CasanovaInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jess HugillInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sheima RafiqInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
James BurridgeInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Vito PuyatInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Josee Ewane EnongueInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Henry GaleInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Hannah AkoteiInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Zoe CollierInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Helen HaggertyNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kathryn SmartNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Christine PowellNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kate TaylorNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Michael P ClarkeInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Graham MorganSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, 1 Science Square, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jenny C A ReadInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe a new stereotest in the form of a game on an autostereoscopic tablet computer designed to be suitable for use in the eye clinic and present data on its reliability and the distribution of stereo thresholds in adults.

methodsTest stimuli were four dynamic random-dot stereograms, one of which contained a disparate target. Feedback was given after each trial presentation. A Bayesian adaptive staircase adjusted target disparity. Threshold was estimated from the mean of the posterior distribution after 20 responses. Viewing distance was monitored via a forehead sticker viewed by the tablet's front camera, and screen parallax was adjusted dynamically so as to achieve the desired retinal disparity.

resultsThe tablet must be viewed at a distance of greater than ∼35 cm to produce a good depth percept. Log thresholds were roughly normally distributed with a mean of 1.75 log

conclusionsASTEROID is reliable, easy, and portable and thus well-suited for clinical stereoacuity measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: New 3D digital technology means that research-quality psychophysical measurement of stereoacuity is now feasible in the clinic.

Indexed as

binocular visiondepth perceptionpsychophysicsstereoacuitystereopsis

Identifiers

PMID30834173
PMCPMC6396686
OpenAlexW2913947715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.