ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
Mathematical modeling of bone in-growth into undegradable porous periodic scaffolds under mechanical stimulus.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in middle-aged and older men: A comprehensive meta-analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- In Silico Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation Kinetics of Poly(Lactic Acid) Vascular Stent Devices.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- A phenomenological model of pulsatile blood pressure-affected degradation of polylactic acid (PLA) vascular stent.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Design and biomechanical analysis of patientspecific porous tantalum prostheses for knee joint revision surgery.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Application of Computational Method in Designing a Unit Cell of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold: A Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- Mechano-Biological Computer Model of Scaffold-Supported Bone Regeneration: Effect of Bone Graft and Scaffold Structure on Large Bone Defect Tissue Patterning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Undegradable scaffolds, as a key element in bone tissue engineering, prevail in the present clinical applications, and the bone in-growth into such scaffolds under mechanical stimulus is an important issue to evaluate the bone-repair effect. This work aims to develop a mathematical framework to investigate the effect of mechanical stimulus on the bone in-growth into undegradable scaffolds. First, the osteoclast and osteoblast activities were coupled by their autocrine and paracrine effects. Second, the mechanical stimulus was empirically incorporated into the coupling cell activities on the basis of experimental observations. Third, the effect of mechanical stimulus including intensity and duration on the bone in-growth process was numerically studied; moreover, the homeostasis of scaffold-bone system under the mechanical stimulus was also treated. The results showed that the numbers of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the scaffold-bone system tended to constants representing the system homeostasis. Both the mechanical intensity and duration optimized the final bone formation. The numerical results of the bone formation were comparable to the experimental results in rats. The findings from this modeling study could be used to explain many physiological phenomena and clinical observations. The developed model integrates both cell and tissue scales, which can be used as a platform to investigate bone remodeling under mechanical stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.