ArticleCardiology research2019
Anti-Hypertensive Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Cardiology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on serum uric acid and blood pressure in patients with hypertension and asymptomatic hyperuricemia: A randomized clinical trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Sacubitril/Valsartan Improves Functional Capacity and Reverses LV Remodeling in Obese Patients with Hypertrophic HFpEF: A Randomized Open-Label Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical studies in Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease dogs: most prescribed ACEI inhibits ACE2 enzyme activity and ARB increases AngII pool in plasma.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Maximizing blood pressure lowering effects: a review of drug class comparisons and rationale for combination approaches.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Network meta-analysis of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of essential hypertension.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Review
- Novel antihypertensive agents for resistant hypertension: what does the future hold?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022Review
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors for hypertension-hemodynamic effects and relevance to hypertensive heart disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022Review
- Highly suspected valsartan-induced chronic erythema nodosum migrans in a patient with hypertension: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Application of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Chinese Expert Consensus.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors: Comprehensive review and implications in hypertension treatment.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021Review
- The Antihypertensive Effects and Safety of LCZ696 in Patients with Hypertension: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor as a novel antihypertensive drug: Evidence from Asia and around the globe.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Review
- Consensus paper on the evaluation and treatment of resistant hypertension by the Turkish Society of Cardiology.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- RETRACTED ARTICLE: Vasodilatory Properties of Sacubitril/Valsartan Explored in Hypertensives Aged Over 55 Years: A Meta-Analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor elderly patients suffering from arterial hypertension, a complete assessment of the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan used as an anti-hypertensive agent is not available yet. Therefore, we decided to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore some endpoints concerning anti-hypertensive efficacy as well as safety of sacubitril/valsartan in elderly hypertensive patients.
methodsPubMed and Scopus have been extensively investigated with the help of some key words until June 15, 2018. The meta-analysis incorporated exclusively RCTs in which the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan were compared with those of a reference drug (comparator) that could be an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a beta-blocker. Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was required as an inclusion criterion in the studies to be included in the meta-analysis. The mean reductions in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the sitting position (msSBP and msDBP, respectively), as well as the mean reductions in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP), were assumed as efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were taken as safety outcomes.
resultsFive RCTs were included with a total of 1,513 patients for analysis. In all studies, the comparator drug was an ARB (valsartan in two cases and olmesartan in the remaining three cases). Compared with ARBs, after 12 weeks there was a significant reduction in msSBP (weight mean difference (WMD) = - 5.41 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.0 to -3.8; P < 0.01), msDBP (WMD = -1.22 mm Hg, 95% CI : -2.15 to -0.3; P < 0.01), maSBP (WMD = -4.58 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.62 to -3.54; P < 0.01) and maDBP (WMD = -2.17 mm Hg, 95% CI: - 2.78 to -1.56; P < 0.01) in elderly hypertensive patients at 12 weeks.
conclusionsSacubitril/valsartan may reduce arterial pressure more efficaciously than ARBs in elderly hypertensive patients. These results have to be confirmed by further RCTs with a good methodological quality, possibly with a greater sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.