Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833985›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2019

Evolution of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.

Yinan Zhang, Amber Salter, Erik Wallström, Gary Cutter, Olaf Stüve

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Choosing initial MS therapy; personal, disease, and medication factors.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A backpack-based myeloid cell therapy for multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinan ZhangDepartment of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Amber SalterDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Erik WallströmSanofi Genzyme, Neuro and Gene Therapy, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gary CutterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Olaf StüveNeurology Section, VA North Texas Health Care System, Medical Service, 4500 South Lancaster Rd., Dallas, TX 75216, USADepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USVA North Texas Health Care System · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials have advanced the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) by demonstrating the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). This review discusses major changes to MS clinical trials in the era of DMTs. As treatment options for MS continue to increase, patients in modern MS trials present earlier and with milder disease compared with historic MS populations. While placebo-controlled trials for some questions may still be relevant, DMT trials in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) are no longer ethical. The replacement of the placebo arm by an active comparator arm in trials have raised the cost of trials by requiring larger sample sizes to detect on-study changes in treatment effects. Efforts to improve trial efficiency in RRMS have focused on exploring adaptive designs and relying on sensitive magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity. In trials for progressive forms of MS (PMS), the lack of sensitive outcome measures that can be used in shorter-term trials have delayed the development of effective treatments. Recent shifting of the focus to advancing trials in PMS has identified paraclinical outcome measurements with improved potential, and the testing of agents for neuroprotection and remyelination is in progress.

Indexed as

clinical trialsdiagnostic criteriamultiple sclerosisoutcome measureprogressive multiple sclerosistrial design

Identifiers

PMID30833985
PMCPMC6391540
OpenAlexW2917118951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.