Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833977›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran)2018

Effect of Oral Bromelain on Wound Healing, Pain, and Bleeding at Donor Site Following Free Gingival Grafting: A Clinical Trial.

Sara Soheilifar, Mohsen Bidgoli, Amirarsalan Hooshyarfard, Armaghan Shahbazi, Farshid Vahdatinia, Fahime Khoshkhooie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Safety of BromAcAmerican journal of cancer research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Outcome measurements following palatal soft tissue graft harvesting: A review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara SoheilifarAssistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mohsen BidgoliAssistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amirarsalan HooshyarfardPostgraduate Student, Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Armaghan ShahbaziAssistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Farshid VahdatiniaDental Surgeon, Dental Research Center, School of Dental Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Fahime KhoshkhooiePrivate Dentist, Hamadan, Iran.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConsidering the optimal efficacy of bromelain for pain relief and wound healing, this study aimed to assess the effect of bromelain on wound healing, pain, and bleeding at the donor site following free gingival grafting (FGG). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized, controlled double-blind clinical trial was performed on 26 patients with gingival recession. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of bromelain and placebo (n=13). Treatment was started on the day of surgery and was continued for 10 days. Pain, bleeding, and epithelialization at the donor site were the variables evaluated in this study using a questionnaire. The level of pain was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS) considering the number of analgesic tablets taken within 7 days postoperatively. Bleeding was determined according to the patient's report, and epithelization was assessed by applying 3% hydrogen peroxide (H

resultsBromelain caused a significant reduction in pain at the donor site (2.605±0.509) compared to the placebo (4.885±0.519; P<0.05). The number of donor sites with complete epithelialization was higher in the bromelain group compared to the placebo, but this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The two groups were the same regarding postoperative bleeding (P>0.05).

conclusionsThe results showed that oral bromelain (500 mg/day) can be effective in the reduction of pain at the donor site after FGG and may also enhance wound healing. Oral bromelain does not increase the risk of postoperative bleeding.

Indexed as

BromelainOperative Surgical ProcedureTransplant Donor SiteWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID30833977
PMCPMC6397736
OpenAlexW2897883537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.