Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833895›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Linking Emotional Reactivity Between Laboratory Tasks and Immersive Environments Using Behavior and Physiology.

Heather Roy, Nick Wasylyshyn, Derek P Spangler, Katherine R Gamble, Debbie Patton, Justin R Brooks, Javier O Garcia, Jean M Vettel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather RoyUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Nick WasylyshynUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Derek P SpanglerUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Katherine R GambleUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Debbie PattonUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Justin R BrooksUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Javier O GarciaUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
Jean M VettelUnited States Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, MD, United States.
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An event or experience can induce different emotional responses between individuals, including strong variability based on task parameters or environmental context. Physiological correlates of emotional reactivity, as well as related constructs of stress and anxiety, have been found across many physiological metrics, including heart rate and brain activity. However, the interdependances and interactions across contexts and between physiological systems are not well understood. Here, we recruited military and law enforcement to complete two experimental sessions across two different days. In the laboratory session, participants viewed high-arousal negative images while brain activity electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from the scalp, and functional connectivity was computed during the task and used as a predictor of emotional response during the other experimental session. In an immersive simulation session, participants performed a shoot-don't-shoot scenario while heart rate electrocardiography (ECG) was recorded. Our analysis examined the relationship between the sessions, including behavioral responses (emotional intensity ratings, task performance, and self-report anxiety) and physiology from different modalities [brain connectivity and heart rate variability (HRV)]. Results replicated previous research and found that behavioral performance was modulated within-session based on varying levels of emotional intensity in the laboratory session (

Indexed as

anxietyEEGemotionemotional reactivityheart rate variabilityimmersive realityneural connectivitystress

Identifiers

PMID30833895
PMCPMC6387949
OpenAlexW2916546651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.