Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833881›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2019

Frameless Fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery with ICON™ for Large Metastatic Brain Tumors.

Hye Ran Park, Kwang-Woo Park, Jae Meen Lee, Jung Hoon Kim, Sang Soon Jeong, Jin Wook Kim, Hyun-Tai Chung, Dong Gyu Kim, Sun Ha Paek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two-Day Fraction Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastasis.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dosimetric comparison of Gamma Knife® IconJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hye Ran ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-4882
Kwang-Woo ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-079X
Jae Meen LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-1644
Jung Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-7758
Sang Soon JeongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8566-0117
Jin Wook KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-3344
Hyun-Tai ChungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8243-2568
Dong Gyu KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-6189
Sun Ha PaekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-8653
Seoul National University Hospital · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, a new generation of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) equipped with a frameless immobilization system has encouraged the use of fractionated GKRS as an increasingly favorable treatment option. We investigated the preliminary outcome of efficacy and toxicity associated with frameless fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (FF GKRS) for the treatment of large metastatic brain tumors.

methodsFifteen patients with 17 lesions were treated using FF GKRS and included in this study, because of the large tumor size of more than 10 cm

resultsThe mean duration of clinical follow-up was 12 months (range, 4-24), and the local control rate was 100%. Tumor volume decreased in 13 lesions (76.5%), and remained stable in 4 lesions (23.5%). One patient was classified as new lesion development because of the occurrence of leptomeningeal seeding regardless of the tumor volume change. Compared with the initial volume at the time of FF GKRS, tumor volume change at the last follow-up was 62.32% ± 29.80%. Cumulative survival rate at 12 months was 93.3% ± 6.4%. One patient died during the follow-up period because of the progression of the primary disease. No patient showed radiation necrosis on the follow-up images.

conclusionDaily FF GKRS by gamma knife ICON™ revealed satisfactory tumor control rate and low morbidity, despite the short follow-up period. Further prospective studies and a longer follow-up of a large cohort of patients diagnosed with brain metastases are required to elucidate the effect of FF GKRS in brain metastases.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeFrameless FractionatedGamma Knife RadiosurgeryICON™Metastatic Brain Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30833881
PMCPMC6393762
OpenAlexW2913332844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.