Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833645›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of impotence research2020

Impact of key pinch strength on patient preference for inflatable penile prosthesis: a prospective study comparing Coloplast™ and AMS™ models.

John M Masterson, Laura Horodyski, Ronak Patel, Omer Kineish, Taylor P Kohn, Ranjith Ramasamy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John M MastersonDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. Jmm557@med.miami.edu.
Laura HorodyskiDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ronak PatelDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Omer KineishDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Taylor P KohnDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ranjith RamasamyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
University of Miami · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine if key pinch strength is predictive of patient preference for a single IPP model among three currently available models (Coloplast™ Titan, Coloplast™ Titan Touch, and the Boston Scientific AMS 700™). We prospectively recruited men without penile prostheses over 65 years old from our urology clinic. Demographic and medical history were recorded. To measure key pinch strength study participants squeezed a dynamometer between their thumb and index finger while seated with their arm resting at 90°; the strongest of three attempts was recorded. Participants were asked to operate three inflatable penile prosthesis devices installed within identical penis models. The number of pumps required to achieve erection with each device was recorded. Participants were asked to rate difficulty of inflation on a 1-5 scale. Participants ranked, from best to worst, which device they preferred based on ease of inflation. A total of 100 men completed the study. Median age and key pinch strength were 70.0 years and 19.0 pounds. Coloplast Titan was the most favored pump based on ease of inflation (58%). The median age, median key pinch strength, and median number of pumps required for erection were similar among men that favored Coloplast Titan as compared with AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan Touch. Multivariate linear regression of the 1-5 rating scale revealed lower grip strength to be associated with increased difficulty of inflation of Coloplast Titan Touch (p  = 0.045). No other factors were associated with increased difficulty of inflation. Men with below-average key pinch strength may benefit from being offered a model other than Coloplast Titan Touch. Whether these findings translate to men who have already received implants remains to be determined. Nevertheless, evaluation of pinch strength should be considered in men prior to implantation of IPP.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePenile ProsthesisAgedHumansLinear ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisPenile ImplantationPenile IndurationPenisPinch StrengthProspective StudiesProsthesis Design

Identifiers

PMID30833645
OpenAlexW2918666745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.