Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833598›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Evidence of age-related improvement in the foraging efficiency of Adélie penguins.

Amélie Lescroël, Grant Ballard, Melanie Massaro, Katie Dugger, Scott Jennings, Annie Pollard, Elizabeth Porzig, Annie Schmidt, Arvind Varsani, David Grémillet and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amélie LescroëlPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA. alescroel@pointblue.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9030-6593
Grant BallardPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-7066
Melanie MassaroSchool of Environmental Sciences, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-1268
Katie DuggerU.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Scott JenningsPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.
Annie PollardPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.
Elizabeth PorzigPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.
Annie SchmidtPoint Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.
Arvind VarsaniThe Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-2415
David GrémilletCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier - EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7711-9398
David AinleyH.T. Harvey & Associates, Los Gatos, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age variation in reproductive performance is well-documented but the mechanisms underlying this variation remain unclear. Foraging efficiency is likely to be a key source of demographic variation as it determines the amount of energy that can be invested in fitness-related activities. Evidence of age-related changes in the foraging efficiency of adult seabirds is scarce and inconsistent. We investigated the effects of age on the foraging efficiency of breeding Adélie penguins, a relatively short-lived seabird species, in order to gain a broader perspective on the processes driving variation in ageing rates. We found support for a positive effect of age, either linear or levelling off at old ages, on both our proxies for daily catch rate and catch per unit effort. Across all age classes, males were more performant foragers than females. We found no strong evidence for differing ageing patterns between sexes or individual quality levels, and no evidence for senescence. We infer that continuous individual improvement could be responsible for a larger amount of the variation in foraging efficiency with age at our study site, compared with selective disappearance of underperforming phenotypes. The different results reported by other studies highlight the need to conduct longitudinal studies across a range of species in different environments.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorAge FactorsAgingAnimalsFemaleMaleSex FactorsSpheniscidae

Identifiers

PMID30833598
PMCPMC6399253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.