Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833560›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Discovery of key whole-brain transitions and dynamics during human wakefulness and non-REM sleep.

A B A Stevner, D Vidaurre, J Cabral, K Rapuano, S F V Nielsen, E Tagliazucchi, H Laufs, P Vuust, G Deco, M W Woolrich and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Awakening: Predicting external stimulation to force transitions between different brain states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sleep neuroimaging: Review and future directions.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

A B A StevnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK. angus.stevner@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-5997
D VidaurreWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-2229
J CabralDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6715-0826
K RapuanoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 03755, Hanover, NH, USA.
S F V NielsenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
E TagliazucchiNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H LaufsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Christian-Alrbrechts-Universität, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-2781
P VuustCenter for Music in the Brain (MIB), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
G DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona, 08018, Spain.
M W WoolrichWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK.
E Van SomerenNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M L KringelbachDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK.
Aarhus University · DKWarneford Hospital · GBGoethe University Frankfurt · DEDartmouth College · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

European Research Council 615539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern understanding of sleep is based on the classification of sleep into stages defined by their electroencephalography (EEG) signatures, but the underlying brain dynamics remain unclear. Here we aimed to move significantly beyond the current state-of-the-art description of sleep, and in particular to characterise the spatiotemporal complexity of whole-brain networks and state transitions during sleep. In order to obtain the most unbiased estimate of how whole-brain network states evolve through the human sleep cycle, we used a Markovian data-driven analysis of continuous neuroimaging data from 57 healthy participants falling asleep during simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and EEG. This Hidden Markov Model (HMM) facilitated discovery of the dynamic choreography between different whole-brain networks across the wake-non-REM sleep cycle. Notably, our results reveal key trajectories to switch within and between EEG-based sleep stages, while highlighting the heterogeneities of stage N1 sleep and wakefulness before and after sleep.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingSensitivity and SpecificitySleep, REMSleep StagesTime FactorsWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID30833560
PMCPMC6399232
OpenAlexW2918768639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.