Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833428›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

Generating Robust and Informative Nonclinical

Jürgen B Bulitta, William W Hope, Ann E Eakin, Tina Guina, Vincent H Tam, Arnold Louie, George L Drusano, Jennifer L Hoover

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bacillus anthracis Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Animal Models, 1947-2019.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Bacteriophage pharmacodynamics studied in anJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jürgen B BulittaCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA jbulitta@cop.ufl.edu Jennifer.L.Hoover@gsk.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-3097
William W HopeCentre for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6187-878X
Ann E EakinNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Tina GuinaNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Vincent H TamCollege of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arnold LouieInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation and Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
George L DrusanoInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation and Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jennifer L HooverAntibacterial Discovery Performance Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA jbulitta@cop.ufl.edu Jennifer.L.Hoover@gsk.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-7541
University of Florida · USNational Institutes of Health · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June 2017, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, organized a workshop entitled "Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) for Development of Therapeutics against Bacterial Pathogens." The aims were to discuss details of various PK/PD models and identify sound practices for deriving and utilizing PK/PD relationships to design optimal dosage regimens for patients. Workshop participants encompassed individuals from academia, industry, and government, including the United States Food and Drug Administration. This and the accompanying review on clinical PK/PD summarize the workshop discussions and recommendations. Nonclinical PK/PD models play a critical role in designing human dosage regimens and are essential tools for drug development. These include

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsHumansMiceAnti-Bacterial Agentsbest practicesdrug developmenthollow fiber systemin vitro infection modelsmouse infection modelsoptimal designpharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamicsprogression and decision criteriavalidationworkshop summary

Identifiers

PMID30833428
PMCPMC6496039
OpenAlexW2919778958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.