Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833403›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Renal reabsorption in 3D vascularized proximal tubule models.

Neil Y C Lin, Kimberly A Homan, Sanlin S Robinson, David B Kolesky, Nathan Duarte, Annie Moisan, Jennifer A Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neil Y C LinWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.
Kimberly A HomanWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.
Sanlin S RobinsonWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.
David B KoleskyWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.
Nathan DuarteWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.
Annie MoisanRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland annie.moisan@roche.com jalewis@seas.harvard.edu.
Jennifer A LewisWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; annie.moisan@roche.com jalewis@seas.harvard.edu.

Funding

The USC (Re)Building the Kidney Coordinating CenterU01DK107350 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL, VALERIUS, MICHAEL TODD · 2015 to 2019
$9.0M
Organ Design and Engineering Training Program (ODET Program)T32EB016652 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BONVENTRE, JOSEPH VINCENT · 2014 to 2023
$3.5M
Kidney Microphysiological Analysis Platforms (MAP) to Optimize Function and Model DiseaseUH3TR002155 · NCATS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BONVENTRE, JOSEPH VINCENT, LEE, LUKE P. · 2019 to 2021
$3.3M
Kidney Microphysiological Analysis Platforms (MAP) to Optimize Function and Model DiseaseUG3TR002155 · NCATS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BONVENTRE, JOSEPH VINCENT, LEE, LUKE P. · 2017 to 2018
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UG3 TR002155NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR002155NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB016652NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK107350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional renal tissues that emulate the cellular composition, geometry, and function of native kidney tissue would enable fundamental studies of filtration and reabsorption. Here, we have created 3D vascularized proximal tubule models composed of adjacent conduits that are lined with confluent epithelium and endothelium, embedded in a permeable ECM, and independently addressed using a closed-loop perfusion system to investigate renal reabsorption. Our 3D kidney tissue allows for coculture of proximal tubule epithelium and vascular endothelium that exhibits active reabsorption via tubular-vascular exchange of solutes akin to native kidney tissue. Using this model, both albumin uptake and glucose reabsorption are quantified as a function of time. Epithelium-endothelium cross-talk is further studied by exposing proximal tubule cells to hyperglycemic conditions and monitoring endothelial cell dysfunction. This diseased state can be rescued by administering a glucose transport inhibitor. Our 3D kidney tissue provides a platform for in vitro studies of kidney function, disease modeling, and pharmacology.

Indexed as

Renal ReabsorptionAlbuminsGlucoseHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKidney Tubules, ProximalMicroscopy, ElectronModels, BiologicalAlbuminsGlucosebioprintingkidney tissueproximal tubulereabsorptionvasculature

Identifiers

PMID30833403
PMCPMC6431199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.