Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833310›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Effects of camera-based mirror visual feedback therapy for patients who had a stroke and the neural mechanisms involved: protocol of a multicentre randomised control study.

Li Ding, Xu Wang, Xiaoli Guo, Shugeng Chen, Hewei Wang, Xiao Cui, Jifeng Rong, Jie Jia

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evidence of mirror therapy for recruitment of ipsilateral motor pathways in stroke recovery: A resting fMRI study.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li DingDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xu WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoli GuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Shugeng ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hewei WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao CuiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Changning Tianshan Traditional Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jifeng RongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The first Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Jie JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-4629
Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs a combination of visual stimulation and motor imagery, mirror visual feedback (MVF) is an effective treatment for motor impairment after stroke; however, few studies have investigated its effects on relevant cognitive processes such as visual perception and motor imagery. Camera-based MVF (camMVF) overcomes the intrinsic limitations of real mirrors and is recognised as an optimal setup. This study aims to investigate the effects of camMVF as an adjunct treatment for stroke patients, compare camMVF outcomes with those of conventional therapy and elucidate neural mechanisms through which MVF influences cognition and brain networks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial including 90 patients randomised into three groups: camera-based mirror visual feedback intervention group (30), shielded mirror visual feedback intervention group (30) and conventional group (30). Patients in each group will receive a 60 min intervention 5 days per week over 4 weeks. The primary outcome will be the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb subscale measurement. Secondary outcomes include the modified Ashworth Scale, Grip Strength test, Modified Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure, Berg Balance Scale, 10-metre walking test, hand-laterality task and electroencephalography . ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the Huashan Hospital Institutional Review Board on 15 March (KY2017-230). We plan to submit the results to a peer-reviewed journal and present them at conferences, rehabilitation forums and to the general public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-INR-17013644; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryBrainHandHumansMotor ActivityMulticenter Studies as TopicNeural PathwaysRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionRestSingle-Blind MethodStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment Outcomeelectroencephalogrammirror visual feedbackmotor imageryneuro-rehabilitationstrokevisual perception

Identifiers

PMID30833310
PMCPMC6443084
OpenAlexW2920029723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.