Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30833168›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2019

Breast Screening Utilization and Cost Sharing Among Employed Insured Women After the Affordable Care Act.

Ruth C Carlos, A Mark Fendrick, Giselle Kolenic, Neil Kamdar, Emily Kobernik, Sarah Bell, Vanessa K Dalton

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Access to Care as a Barrier to Mammography for Black Women.Policy, politics & nursing practice · 2021
    Article
  12. FOXO1 and hsa-microRNA-204-5p affect the biologic behavior of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruth C CarlosDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Program for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: rcarlos@med.umich.edu.
A Mark FendrickProgram for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Value-Based Insurance Design, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Giselle KolenicProgram for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Consulting for Statistics, Computing and Analytics Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Neil KamdarProgram for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Emily KobernikProgram for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sarah BellProgram for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vanessa K DaltonProgram for Women's Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

ECOG-ACRIN NCORP Research Base - TMISTUG1CA189828 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$199.7M
UM LAPs- U10 GrantU10CA180801 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZALUPSKI, MARK M · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180801NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess changes in screening mammography cost sharing and utilization before and after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the revised US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. To compare mammography cost sharing between women aged 40 to 49 and those 50 to 74.

methodsWe used patient-level analytic files between 2004 and 2014 from Clinformatics Data Mart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minnesota). We included women 40 to 74 years without a history of breast cancer or mastectomy. We conducted an interrupted time series analyses assessing cost sharing and utilization trends before and after the ACA implementation and USPSTF revised guidelines.

resultsWe identified 1,763,959 commercially insured women aged 40 to 74 years. Between 2004 and 2014, the proportion of women with zero cost share for screening mammography increased from 81.9% in 2004 to 98.2% in 2014, reaching 93.1% with the 2010 ACA implementation. The adjusted median cost share remained $0 over time. Initially at 36.0% in 2004, screening utilization peaked at 42.2% in 2009 with the USPSTF guidelines change, dropping to 40.0% in 2014. Comparing women aged 40 to 49, 50 to 64, and 65 to 74, the proportion exposed to cost sharing declined over time in all groups.

conclusionsA substantial majority of commercially insured women had first-dollar coverage for mammography before the ACA. After ACA, nearly all women had access to zero cost-share mammography. The lack of an increase in mammography use post-ACA can be partially attributed to a USPSTF guideline change, the high proportion of women without cost sharing before the ACA, and the relatively low levels of cost sharing before the policy implementation.

Indexed as

Cost SharingAdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Benefit Plans, EmployeeHumansIncidenceInsurance CoverageMammographyMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareAffordable Care Actbreast cancer screeningbreast cancer screening utilizationcost sharing eliminationmammographyscreening mammography cost share

Identifiers

PMID30833168
PMCPMC7384237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.