Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30832739›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Matias C Vieira, Sophie Relph, Andrew Copas, Andrew Healey, Kirstie Coxon, Alessandro Alagna, Annette Briley, Mark Johnson, Deborah A Lawlor, Christoph Lees and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Perinatal outcomes after selective third-trimester ultrasound screening for small-for-gestational age: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Characteristics associated with antenatally unidentified small-for-gestational-age fetuses: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age fetus: economic evaluation of Growth Assessment Protocol.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Matias C VieiraDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Sophie RelphDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Andrew CopasCentre for Pragmatic Global Health Trials, Institute for Global Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andrew HealeyDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Kirstie CoxonFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston and St. George's University, 6th Floor, Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Alessandro AlagnaThe Guy's and St Thomas' Charity, 9 King's Head Yard, London, SE1 1NA, UK.
Annette BrileyDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Mark JohnsonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Deborah A LawlorPopulation Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BL, UK.
Christoph LeesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Neil MarlowUCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Lesley McCowanFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Victoria Street West, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Louise PageWest Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Twickenham Road, Isleworth, TW7 6AF, UK.
Donald PeeblesUCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andrew ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Baskaran ThilaganathanFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Asma KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Dharmintra PasupathyDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre KHP, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. dharmintra.pasupathy@kcl.ac.uk.
DESiGN Collaborative Group
St Thomas' Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Bristol · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Metabolomic and Epigenomic Mechanisms in Developmental Overnutrition.R01DK103246 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL · PI LAWLOR, DEBORAH ANNE · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Department of Health NIHR-KMF-2012-01-29Guy's and St Thomas' Charity (GB) MAJ150704NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103246Stillborn and Neonatal Death Charity (GB) RG1011/16Tommy's Baby Charity MQATAVR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve the stillbirth rate. The Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) describes a complex intervention that includes risk assessment for SGA and screening using customised fundal-height growth charts. Increased detection of SGA from the use of GAP has been implicated in the reduction of stillbirth rates by 22%, in observational studies of UK regions where GAP uptake was high. This study will be the first randomised controlled trial examining the clinical efficacy, health economics and implementation of the GAP programme in the antenatal detection of SGA. METHODS/

designIn this randomised controlled trial, clusters comprising a maternity unit (or National Health Service Trust) were randomised to either implementation of the GAP programme, or standard care. The primary outcome is the rate of antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA in infants found to be SGA at birth by both population and customised standards, as this is recognised as being the group with highest risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes include antenatal detection of SGA by population centiles, antenatal detection of SGA by customised centiles, short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes, resource use and economic consequences, and a process evaluation of GAP implementation. Qualitative interviews will be performed to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation of GAP. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to provide data and outcomes from a randomised controlled trial investigating the potential difference between the GAP programme compared to standard care for antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA infants. Accurate information on the performance and service provision requirements of the GAP protocol has the potential to inform national policy decisions on methods to reduce the rate of stillbirth.

trial registrationPrimary registry and trial identifying number: ISRCTN 67698474 . Registered on 2 November 2016.

Indexed as

Fetal WeightInfant, Small for Gestational AgeStillbirthUltrasonography, PrenatalFemaleFetal DevelopmentGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsUnited KingdomCustomised growth centilesHealth economicsImplementation researchSmall-for-gestational-age foetusStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID30832739
PMCPMC6398257
OpenAlexW2934218205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.