Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30832733›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.

Christopher R Long, Rachel S Purvis, Elizabeth Flood-Grady, Kim S Kimminau, Robert L Rhyne, Mark R Burge, M Kathryn Stewart, Amy J Jenkins, Laura P James, Pearl A McElfish

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07180147 (Arlington Longitudinal Optimal Healthy Aging Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07180147 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Arlington Longitudinal Optimal Healthy Aging Study (ALOHA)

TypeobservationalSponsorMarymount UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled500ConditionsAlzheimer Disease (AD), Cardio Vascular Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Frailty Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Closing the Feedback Loop: Improving Communication of Findings With Aboriginal Research Participants Through Participatory Action Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher R LongCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR, 72703, United States of America.
Rachel S PurvisOffice of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR, 72703, United States of America.
Elizabeth Flood-GradySTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications and Recruitment Center, Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, 1185 Stadium Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States of America.
Kim S KimminauDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, United States of America.
Robert L RhyneDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC09 5040, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
Mark R BurgeClinical and Translational Science Center, Health Science Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
M Kathryn StewartFay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR, 72205, United States of America.
Amy J JenkinsTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR, 72205, United States of America.
Laura P JamesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR, 72205, United States of America.
Pearl A McElfishCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR, 72703, United States of America. pamcelfish@uams.edu.

Funding

Engaging University of California Stakeholders for Biorespository ResearchUL1TR000004 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$78.0M
RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
Using Integrated Omics to Identify Dysfunctional Genetic Mechanisms Influencing Schizophrenia and Sleep DisturbancesP20GM130423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDREW K. GODWIN · 2019 to 2026
$21.5M
The Role of the Mitochondrion in the Metabolic Stress Response to Burn TraumaP20GM109096 · NIGMS · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · PI JANSEN, LISA TJORVEN · 2016 to 2025
$20.7M
Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasU54TR001629 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2017 to 2017
$3.5M
NCI CLINICAL INVESTIGATOR AWARDK08CA001427 · NCI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI MALTER, JAMES S. · 1988 to 1990
–
NCATS NIH HHS 1U54TR001629-01A1NCATS NIH HHS 8UL1TR00004NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001629NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000004NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002366NCATS NIH HHS UL1TROO1427NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109096NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough research participants are generally interested in receiving results from studies in which they participate, health researchers rarely communicate study findings to participants. The present study was designed to provide opportunity for a broad group of health researchers to describe their experiences and concerns related to sharing results (i.e. aggregate study findings) with research participants.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation design, relying on an online survey to capture health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants. Respondents were health researchers who conduct research that includes the consent of human subjects and hold a current appointment at an accredited academic medical institution within the United States. For quantitative data, the analytic strategy focused on item-level descriptive analyses. For the qualitative data, analyses focused on a priori themes and emergent subthemes.

resultsRespondents were 414 researchers from 44 academic medical institutions; 64.5% reported that results should always be shared with participants, yet 60.8% of respondents could identify studies in which they had a leadership role where results were not shared. Emergent subthemes from researchers' reasons why results should be shared included participant ownership of findings and benefits of results sharing to science. Reasons for not sharing included concerns related to participants' health literacy and participants' lack of desire for results. Across all respondents who described barriers to results sharing, the majority described logistical barriers.

conclusionsStudy findings contribute to the literature by documenting researchers' perspectives and experiences about sharing results with research participants, which can inform efforts to improve results sharing. Most respondents indicated that health research results should always be shared with participants, although the extent to which many respondents described barriers to results sharing as well as reported reasons not to share results suggests difficulties with a one-size-fits-all approach to improving results sharing.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiomedical ResearchDisclosureInformation DisseminationResearch PersonnelResearch SubjectsCommunicationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdissemination surveyhealth research disseminationresearch communicationResearch disseminationresearch resultsresults sharing

Identifiers

PMID30832733
PMCPMC6399828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.