ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019
Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: experiences and challenges, a qualitative study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- In situ simulation training for a better interprofessional team performance in transferring critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective randomised control trial.Postgraduate medical journal · 2022Trial
- Article
- Helicopter emergency medical services for interfacility transfers: an Italian expert consensus.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Developing and psychometrics assessment of a checklist for safe intrahospital patient transfer.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Developing sensitive quality indicators for ground inter-hospital transport of adult critically ill patients using Donabedian model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Patient Transfer Process From Pre-Hospital to the Hospital Emergency Department: A Grounded Theory Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Critically ill patients undergoing interhospital transportation: a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- Decision-making in interhospital transfer of traumatic brain injury patients: exploring the perspectives of surgeons at general hospitals and neurosurgeons at neurotrauma centres.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and psychometric testing of a scale to measure effective rural emergency transfer (RET).BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Ambulance nurses' experiences as the sole caregiver with critical patients during long ambulance transports: an interview study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Advancing healthcare through mobile collaboration: a survey of intelligent nursing robots research.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Obstacles to using the safe surgery checklist: Perspectives of first-line personnel.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Potentially Severe Incidents During Interhospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients, Frequently Occurring But Rarely Reported: A Prospective Study.Journal of patient safety · 2022Article
- Aeromedical interhospital transport of an adult with COVID-19 on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: case report.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022Article
- Transfer boarding delays care more in low-volume rural emergency departments: A cohort study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022Article
- Collective Critical Care Ambulance: an innovative transportation of critical care patients by bus in COVID-19 pandemic response.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Transport of critically ill COVID-19 patients.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo consensus based national standard for interhospital transports of critically ill patients exists in Norway. The local hospitals are responsible for funding, organizing and performing these transports, resulting in potentially different level of care for the critically ill patients depending on local hospital resources and not the level of severity in the patient's condition. The aim of this study was to examine how these transports are executed and to discover challenges during transports and potentials of improvement.
methodsA qualitative study with 20 semi-structured interviews of doctors, nurses and ambulance personnel representing a wide range in experience and formal education, reflecting the different compositions of crews performing interhospital transports was conducted. A systematic text condensation of the interviews was performed to describe personal experiences and values.
resultsFew interviewees reported special adverse events when asked. Instead they chose to describe more general characteristics of the working environment, their own positive emotions or fears and the strengths and weaknesses of the organizational system. The prehospital working environment was described as different from the in-hospital environment. The personnel experienced being on their own during transports, lack of procedures and checklists and often no systematic education or demanded preparedness for participating. The resident doctors described pressure from elderly colleagues to participate in the transports. At the same time, all interviewees reported a self-interest in participating in these transports.
conclusionsSafe interhospital transports of the critically ill patients are challenged by the characteristics of the out of hospital environment. The transports are described as potentially unsafe for both patients and personnel. Systematic education is warranted, highlighting the use of checklists and special educational programs in prehospital critical care medicine. The strong personal interest to participate in these transports may serve as a barrier against changing todays system. To ensure the right level of competence and safety for each unique patient, it is imperative to standardize the interhospital transports on a national level, built on consensus from experienced prehospital personnel.
trial registrationThe trial is approved and registered by the local representative for the Norwegian Data Protection Authority as trial 13-7751.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.