SynthesisImplementation science : IS2019
Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of pharmacogenomic testing for antidepressants use in primary care: a systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Pooled it
- Factors influencing mutual trust in interprofessional partnerships within primary care settings: a systematic review.Family practice · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Community Pharmacy-Led Depression Services: Service Components, Outcomes, and Implementation Barriers and Facilitators.Depression and anxiety · 2026Pooled it
- Investigating digital determinants shaping pharmacists' preparedness for interoperability and health informatics practice evolution: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Evidence-Based Interventions for Adults Within Occupational and Physical Therapy Practice Settings: A Systematic Review.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Midwives' use of best available evidence in practice: An integrative review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Community pharmacy transformation under universal health coverage: Implementation barriers, cultural determinants, and cross-national lessons from Japan's ongoing transition - A narrative review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Review
- Building Tobacco Treatment Capacity and Sustainability: A Qualitative Study on Implementation of Community Pharmacy Technicians as Community Health Workers.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) informed exploration of a primary care intervention to support deprescribing for problematic polypharmacy in older adults living with frailty (DEPPLOY) in England: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- A scoping review and systems thinking synthesis of scale-up frameworks.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Tailoring the CFIR to Medication Adherence Interventions: A Delphi and Living Lab Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in Health Settings: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Implementation priorities in Australian community pharmacy: A semi-structured survey of Australian pharmacists.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Availability, utilization, and factors associated with professional pharmacy services in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026Article
- Australian pharmacists' experiences and perspectives in implementing a chronic kidney disease screening service in community pharmacies: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of community pharmacist views on providing a mental health and well-being intervention for long-term condition patients.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Preparing for pharmacy-based delivery of long-acting injectable antiretrovirals: a pre-implementation study.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Prescription for Digital Evolution: Transformative Recommendations for Pharmacy Practice in the Digital Age.Journal of pharmacy practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo meet emergent healthcare needs, innovations need to be implemented into routine clinical practice. Community pharmacy is increasingly considered a setting through which innovations can be implemented to achieve positive service and clinical outcomes. Small-scale pilot programmes often need scaled up nation-wide to affect population level change. This systematic review aims to identify facilitators and barriers to the national implementation of community pharmacy innovations.
methodsA systematic review exploring pharmacy staff perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to implementing innovations at a national level was conducted. The databases Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Open Grey were searched and supplemented with additional search mechanisms such as Zetoc alerts. Eligible studies underwent quality assessment, and a directed content analysis approach to data extraction was conducted and aligned to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to facilitate narrative synthesis.
resultsThirty-nine studies were included: 16 were qualitative, 21 applied a questionnaire design, and 2 were mixed methods. Overarching thematic areas spanning across the CFIR domains were pharmacy staff engagement (e.g. their positive and negative perceptions), operationalisation of innovations (e.g. insufficient resources and training), and external engagement (e.g. the perceptions of patients and other healthcare professionals, and their relationship with the community pharmacy). Study participants commonly suggested improvements in the training offered, in the engagement strategies adopted, and in the design and quality of innovations.
conclusionsThis study's focus on national innovations resulted in high-level recommendations to facilitate the development of successful national implementation strategies. These include (1) more robust piloting of innovations, (2) improved engagement strategies to increase awareness and acceptance of innovations, (3) promoting whole-team involvement within pharmacies to overcome time constraints, and (4) sufficient pre-implementation evaluation to gauge acceptance and appropriateness of innovations within real-world settings. The findings highlight the international challenge of balancing the professional, clinical, and commercial obligations within community pharmacy practice. A preliminary theory of how salient factors influence national implementation in the community pharmacy setting has been developed, with further research necessary to understand how the influence of these factors may differ within varying contexts.
trial registrationA protocol for this systematic review was developed and uploaded onto the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews database (Registration number: CRD42016038876 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.