Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30832637›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Dealing with health literacy at the organisational level, French translation and adaptation of the Vienna health literate organisation self-assessment tool.

Gilles Henrard, Marc Vanmeerbeek, Laetitia Buret, Jany Rademakers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gilles HenrardDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Liège, Postal address: 13 avenue Hippocrate, Quartier Hôpital B23, 4000, Liège, Belgium. gilles.henrard@uliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-2876
Marc VanmeerbeekDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Liège, Postal address: 13 avenue Hippocrate, Quartier Hôpital B23, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Laetitia BuretDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Liège, Postal address: 13 avenue Hippocrate, Quartier Hôpital B23, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Jany RademakersNivel, PO box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University of Liège · BEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to address health literacy should favour a system-based approach with the dual aim both of fostering the material conditions and creating a work culture inside health care organisations that makes it easier for people to use information. The Vienna Health Literate Organisation (V-HLO) self-assessment tool is a German-speaking questionnaire for quality managers of health care organisations. Its objective is to provide a diagnostic of the strengths and weaknesses of the organisation in terms of health literacy. Our goal was to translate and culturally adapt this questionnaire for the French-speaking part of Belgium.

methodsWe followed the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretesting, and Documentation (TRAPD) team model for cross-cultural translation of questionnaires. We used cognitive interviews with quality experts to pre-test the translation.

resultsCognitive interviews allowed us to improve the translation by removing certain ambiguities, providing contextual clarifications or rephrasing some items in such a way as to render them more culturally appropriate. Local experts generally judged the tool to be relevant and applicable to their context. The insight gained with regard to their cognitive process when completing the V-HLO allowed us to identify possible barriers to the adoption of the tool (such as difficulties in considering staff literacy as a relevant target for the tool, fear of overwhelming staff, a feeling that some items fell outside the scope of health literacy and lack of attention for integration of services with primary care) and could contribute to the future development of the tool.

conclusionWe translated and adapted the V-HLO self-assessment tool for French. The French version of the V-HLO will now be implemented in our local context to assess whether it can make it easier for people to deal with the complexities of health care organisations.

Indexed as

Health LiteracySelf-AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsBelgiumDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleTranslatingHealth literacy (MeSH)Organisational culture (MeSH)Organisational health literacyOrganisational innovation (MeSH)QuestionnaireTranslation

Identifiers

PMID30832637
PMCPMC6399896
OpenAlexW2934208233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.