ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2019
Headache service quality: the role of specialized headache centres within structured headache services, and suggested standards and criteria as centres of excellence.
Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Headache-attributed burden among children and adolescents in Georgia: estimates from a national cross-sectional schools-based study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Healthcare providers' perspectives on headache care in Azerbaijan: results of a national cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- The Global Campaign against Headache, aged 21: a critical self-appraisal, and plans for phase 2.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Consistency between headache diagnoses and ICHD-3 criteria across different levels of care.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Article
- Unravelling Migraine Stigma: A Comprehensive Review of Its Impact and Strategies for Change.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Specific cognitive and psychological alterations are more strongly linked to increased migraine disability than chronic migraine diagnosis.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 1.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- The Mental Health Toll of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults with Migraine: A Prospective Analysis of Depression Using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Complex Patient Navigation by Veteran Patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for Chronic Headache Disease: A Qualitative Study.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- Barriers to headache care in low- and middle-income countries.eNeurologicalSci · 2022Review
- The Global Campaign turns 18: a brief review of its activities and achievements.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Review
- Results of the gErman migraine PatIent Survey on medical Care and prOPhylactic treatment Experience (EPISCOPE).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Structured headache services as the solution to the ill-health burden of headache. 3. Modelling effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implementation in Europe: findings and conclusions.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
- Structured headache services as the solution to the ill-health burden of headache: 1. Rationale and descriptionThe journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
- 21st century headache: mapping new territory.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
- Management of Migraine and the Accessibility of Specialist Care: Findings from an Extended Multinational Survey (My Migraine Center Survey).Neurology and therapy · 2020Article
- Proposal of a clinical care pathway for quality and safe management of headache patients: a consensus study report.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Real-life data on the efficacy and safety of erenumab in the Abruzzo region, central Italy.The journal of headache and pain · 2020Article
- Video consultation for non-acute headache by neurologist is not inferior to traditional consultations in terms of headache consultation rate at follow-up:Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In joint initiatives, the European Headache Federation and Lifting The Burden have described a model of structured headache services (with their basis in primary care), defined service quality in this context, and developed practical methods for its evaluation.Here, in a continuation of the service quality evaluation programme, we set out ten suggested role- and performance-defining standards for specialized headache centres operating as an integral component of these services. Verifiable criteria for evaluation accompany each standard. The purposes are five-fold: (i) to inspire and promote, or stimulate the establishment of, specialized headache centres as centres of excellence; (ii) to define the role of such centres within optimally structured and organized national headache services; (iii) to set out criteria by which such centres may be recognized as exemplary in their fulfilment of this role; (iv) to provide the basis for, and to initiate and motivate, collaboration and networking between such centres both nationally and internationally; (v) ultimately to improve the delivery and quality of health care for headache.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.