ArticleBMC medical research methodology2019
Performance of the WHOQOL-BREF among Norwegian substance use disorder patients.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining quality of life by recovery status among college students with a history of substance use.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Quality of life whilst ageing in opioid agonist treatment: a narrative analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Relapse Prevention Group Therapy in Indonesia Involving Peers via Videoconferencing for Substance Use Disorder: Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the executive functions and quality of life in a sample of Egyptian male adolescents with substance use disorder: A case-control study.Discover mental health · 2024Article
- Quality of life and associated factors of heroin-dependent patients receiving methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2023Article
- Visual Impairment in Hemodialyzed Patients-An IVIS Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Aspects of Quality of Life in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review Based on the WHOQOL Questionnaire.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Review
- Former inpatients' narratives of substance use four years after substance use disorder treatment: A qualitative follow-up study.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2022Article
- Re: Multicenter survey of symptoms, work life, economic status, and quality of life of complex regional pain syndrome patients.The Korean journal of pain · 2022Article
- Health-related quality of life measured by EQ-5D-3L for the spouses of breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Perceived Caregiver Stress, Coping, and Quality of Life of Older Ugandan Grandparent-Caregivers.Journal of cross-cultural gerontology · 2020Article
- Quality of Life in Patients With Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Relationship to Impulsivity and Drug Use Characteristics.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of life (QoL) is an established outcome measure of substance use disorder treatment. The WHOQOL-BREF is the gold standard tool, but its appropriateness for particularly vulnerable patient populations must be further explored. This article examines the scaling qualities of the WHOQOL-BREF in a Norwegian substance use disorder population, and explores relationships with social and health variables.
methods107 participants in a larger national treatment study provided data during structured interviews. Item responses, responsiveness, and domain scaling qualities are reported. General linear models identified correlates of impaired QoL.
resultsThree out of four domains exhibited acceptable scaling qualities, while the social relationships domain had low internal validity. 59% of the variance in physical health QoL was explained in our model by the negative main or interaction effects of depression, unemployment, social isolation, smoking, residential treatment, and weight dissatisfaction. 52% of the variance in psychological health QoL was explained by depression and being single. Depression also had significant main effects in social relationships QoL (R
conclusionsAfter one year in treatment, the impact of low social contact in reducing QoL, rather than specific substance use patterns, was striking. The social relationships domain is the shortest in the WHOQOL-BREF, yet social variables were important in other areas of QoL. Social support could benefit from more attention in treatment, as a lack of social support seems to be a strong risk factor for poor QoL in various domains. The WHOQOL-BREF exhibits otherwise satisfactory measurement characteristics and is an appropriate tool among this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.