Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30832448›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Research Methods and Ethics in Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management: The Result of the Kobe Expert Meeting.

Myo Nyein Aung, Virginia Murray, Ryoma Kayano

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Hospitals as disaster victims: Lessons not learned?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Research Frontiers of Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management: What Do We Know So Far?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Myo Nyein AungAdvanced Health Science Institute and Faculty of International Liberal Arts, Juntendo University, Hongo 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan. myo@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8175-6309
Virginia MurrayHead of Global Disaster Risk Reduction, Public Health England, Wellington House, 133-155, Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, UK. Virginia.Murray@phe.gov.uk.
Ryoma KayanoWorld Health Organization Centre for Health Development, 1-5-1 Wakinohama-kaigandori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 651-0073, Japan. kayanor@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In October 2018, at Asia Pacific Conference for Disaster Medicine (APCDM), an expert meeting to identify key research needs was organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) Centre for Health Development (WHO Kobe Centre (WKC)), convening the leading experts from Asia Pacific region, WHO, WHO Thematic Platform for Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM) Research Network (TPRN), World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM), in collaboration with Asia Pacific Conference for Disaster Medicine (APCDM) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). International experts, who were pre-informed about the meeting, contributed experience-based priority issues in Health-EDRM research, ethics, and scientific publication. Two moderators, experienced in multi-disciplinary research interacted with discussants to transcribe practical issues into related methodological and ethical issues. Each issue was addressed in order to progress research and scientific evidence in Health-EDRM. Further analysis of interactive dialogues revealed priorities for action, proposed mechanism to address these and identified recommendations. Thematic discussion uncovered five priority areas: (1) the need to harmonize Health-EDRM research with universal terms and, definitions via a glossary; (2) mechanisms to facilitate and speed up ethical review process; (3) increased community participation and stakeholder involvement in generating research ideas and in assessing impact evaluation; (4) development of reference materials such as possible consensus statements; and (5) the urgent need for a research methods resource textbook for Health-EDRM addressing these issues.

Indexed as

Disaster MedicineDisaster PlanningEmergency MedicineGuidelines as TopicHumansInternational AgenciesInternational CooperationJapanResearch DesignWorld Health Organizationethicsglossaryhealth emergency and disaster risk management (Health-EDRM)research methodsSendai Framework for Disaster Risk ReductionWHO Thematic Platform for Health-EDRM

Identifiers

PMID30832448
PMCPMC6427199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.