Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Nandadevi Cortes-RodriguezCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA. mcortes@ithaca.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2922-8012
Michael G CampanaCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA. CampanaM@si.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0461-6462
Lainie BerryDepartment of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. lainie.berry@hawaii.gov.
Sarah FaegreDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. sfaegre@gmail.com.
Scott R DerricksonCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA. derricksons@outlook.com.
Renee Robinette HaDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. robinet@u.washington.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0691-997X
Rebecca B DikowCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA. dikowr@si.edu.
Christian RutzCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK. christian.rutz@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Robert C FleischerCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA. FleischerR@si.edu.
Funding
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) David Phillips Fellowship BB/G023913/2
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The Mariana Crow, or Åga (
Indexed as
AnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesCrowsEndangered SpeciesEvolution, MolecularFemaleGuamHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMetagenomicsPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome SequencingConservationInbreedingMariana CrowPopulation declinePopulation genomicsSNPs
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Population Genomics and Structure of the Critically Endangered Mariana Crow ( · full record | OpenQuestion