Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30832218›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

RPITER: A Hierarchical Deep Learning Framework for ncRNA⁻Protein Interaction Prediction.

Cheng Peng, Siyu Han, Hui Zhang, Ying Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PmliHFM: Predicting Plant miRNA-lncRNA Interactions with Hybrid Feature Mining Network.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bioinformatic Tools for the Analysis and Prediction of ncRNA Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng PengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Symbol Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China. pengcheng2114@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Siyu HanCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Symbol Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China. hansy15@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Hui ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Symbol Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China. huizhang16@mails.jlu.edu.cn.
Ying LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Symbol Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China. liying@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7804-149X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71774154, 61472158 and 61402194Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 20180101331JC and 20180101050JC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) play crucial roles in multiple fundamental biological processes, such as post-transcriptional gene regulation, and are implicated in many complex human diseases. Mostly ncRNAs function by interacting with corresponding RNA-binding proteins. The research on ncRNA⁻protein interaction is the key to understanding the function of ncRNA. However, the biological experiment techniques for identifying RNA⁻protein interactions (RPIs) are currently still expensive and time-consuming. Due to the complex molecular mechanism of ncRNA⁻protein interaction and the lack of conservation for ncRNA, especially for long ncRNA (lncRNA), the prediction of ncRNA⁻protein interaction is still a challenge. Deep learning-based models have become the state-of-the-art in a range of biological sequence analysis problems due to their strong power of feature learning. In this study, we proposed a hierarchical deep learning framework RPITER to predict RNA⁻protein interaction. For sequence coding, we improved the conjoint triad feature (CTF) coding method by complementing more primary sequence information and adding sequence structure information. For model design, RPITER employed two basic neural network architectures of convolution neural network (CNN) and stacked auto-encoder (SAE). Comprehensive experiments were performed on five benchmark datasets from PDB and NPInter databases to analyze and compare the performances of different sequence coding methods and prediction models. We found that CNN and SAE deep learning architectures have powerful fitting abilities for the

Indexed as

Machine LearningSoftwareAnimalsHumansProtein BindingRNA, Long NoncodingSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Long NoncodingCNNdeep learningncRNAncRNA–protein interaction prediction

Identifiers

PMID30832218
PMCPMC6429152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.