Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30831567›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019

Speech synthesis from ECoG using densely connected 3D convolutional neural networks.

Miguel Angrick, Christian Herff, Emily Mugler, Matthew C Tate, Marc W Slutzky, Dean J Krusienski, Tanja Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electroencephalography, Magnetoencephalography, and Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decoding speech intent from non-frontal cortical areas.Journal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miguel AngrickCognitive Systems Lab, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7050-3397
Christian HerffCognitive Systems Lab, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-2618
Emily MuglerDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-8333
Matthew C TateDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-7722
Marc W SlutzkyDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2269-7729
Dean J KrusienskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4668-5784
Tanja SchultzCognitive Systems Lab, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9809-7028

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science (MCTS) Program (UL1)UL1TR000150 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LLOYD-JONES, DONALD M · 2012 to 2013
$10.1M
Designing brain machine interfaces to drive plasticity and enhance recovery after brain injuryR01NS094748 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DO, AN, SLUTZKY, MARC W. · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
The Cortical Dynamics of Motor Activity During Speech ProductionF32DC015708 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MUGLER, EMILY M · 2016 to 2016
$53k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000150NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015708NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDirect synthesis of speech from neural signals could provide a fast and natural way of communication to people with neurological diseases. Invasively-measured brain activity (electrocorticography; ECoG) supplies the necessary temporal and spatial resolution to decode fast and complex processes such as speech production. A number of impressive advances in speech decoding using neural signals have been achieved in recent years, but the complex dynamics are still not fully understood. However, it is unlikely that simple linear models can capture the relation between neural activity and continuous spoken speech. APPROACH: Here we show that deep neural networks can be used to map ECoG from speech production areas onto an intermediate representation of speech (logMel spectrogram). The proposed method uses a densely connected convolutional neural network topology which is well-suited to work with the small amount of data available from each participant. MAIN

resultsIn a study with six participants, we achieved correlations up to r  =  0.69 between the reconstructed and original logMel spectrograms. We transfered our prediction back into an audible waveform by applying a Wavenet vocoder. The vocoder was conditioned on logMel features that harnessed a much larger, pre-existing data corpus to provide the most natural acoustic output. SIGNIFICANCE: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that high-quality speech has been reconstructed from neural recordings during speech production using deep neural networks.

Indexed as

Communication Devices for People with DisabilitiesNeural Networks, ComputerCerebral CortexElectrocorticographyHumansPhotic StimulationSpeech

Identifiers

PMID30831567
PMCPMC6822609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.