Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30831310›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2019

Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging.

Dustin Scheinost, Stephanie Noble, Corey Horien, Abigail S Greene, Evelyn Mr Lake, Mehraveh Salehi, Siyuan Gao, Xilin Shen, David O'Connor, Daniel S Barron and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 240 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Connectome-based encoding of subjective drug responses to acute oral methamphetamine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dustin ScheinostDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, USA; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, USA; Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, USA; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: dustin.scheinost@yale.edu.
Stephanie NobleInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
Corey HorienInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
Abigail S GreeneInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
Evelyn Mr LakeDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
Mehraveh SalehiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, USA.
Siyuan GaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, USA.
Xilin ShenDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
David O'ConnorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, USA.
Daniel S BarronDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
Sarah W YipChild Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, USA.
Monica D RosenbergDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, USA.
R Todd ConstableDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, USA; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007205 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 1985 to 2019
$42.9M
Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Clinical Neuroscience Research Training Program in PsychiatryT32MH019961 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher John Pittenger · 1996 to 2026
$5.9M
Schizophrenia Research FellowshipR25MH071584 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher John Pittenger · 2005 to 2026
$4.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007205NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH071584NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019961NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing brain-behavior associations that map brain organization to phenotypic measures and generalize to novel individuals remains a challenge in neuroimaging. Predictive modeling approaches that define and validate models with independent datasets offer a solution to this problem. While these methods can detect novel and generalizable brain-behavior associations, they can be daunting, which has limited their use by the wider connectivity community. Here, we offer practical advice and examples based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) functional connectivity data for implementing these approaches. We hope these ten rules will increase the use of predictive models with neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainConnectomeHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingClassificationConnectomeCross-validationMachine learningNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID30831310
PMCPMC6521850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.