Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30831158›Full record

ArticleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2019

Developing OECD test guidelines for regulatory testing of nanomaterials to ensure mutual acceptance of test data.

Kirsten Rasmussen, Hubert Rauscher, Peter Kearns, Mar González, Juan Riego Sintes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. ASCOT: A web tool for the digital construction of energy minimized Ag, CuO, TiOComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten RasmussenEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, (VA), Italy. Electronic address: kirsten.rasmussen@ec.europa.eu.
Hubert RauscherEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, (VA), Italy. Electronic address: hubert.rauscher@ec.europa.eu.
Peter KearnsOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Environment Directorate, 75775, Paris CEDEX 16, France. Electronic address: peter.kearns@oecd.org.
Mar GonzálezOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Environment Directorate, 75775, Paris CEDEX 16, France. Electronic address: mar.gonzalez@oecd.org.
Juan Riego SintesEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, (VA), Italy. Electronic address: juan.riego-sintes@ec.europa.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials (WPMN) provides a global forum for discussion of nano-safety issues. Together with the OECD Test Guidelines Programme (TGP) the WPMN has explored the need for adaptation of some of the existing OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) and Guidance Documents (GDs) as well as developing new TGs and GDs to specifically address NM issues. An overview is provided of progress in the TGP and WPMN, and information on supporting initiatives, regarding the development of TGs for nanomaterials addressing Physical Chemical Properties, Effects on Biotic Systems, Environmental Fate and Behaviour, and Health Effects. Three TGs specifically addressing manufactured nanomaterials have been adopted: a new TG318 ″Dispersion Stability of Nanomaterials in Simulated Environmental Media", and adaptation of TG412 and TG413 on Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study/90-day Study. The associated GD39 on Inhalation Toxicity Testing has also been revised. The TGP current develops four new TGs and four GDs. One new TG and six GDs are developed in the WPMN. Six new proposals were submitted to the TGP in 2018. Furthermore, as TGs are accompanied by OECD harmonised templates (OHTs) for data collection, an outline of recently developed OHTs particularly relevant for NMs is also included.

Indexed as

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentAdministration, InhalationAnimalsHumansNanostructuresToxicity TestsHazard assessmentNanomaterialOECD test guidelinesTest methods

Identifiers

PMID30831158
PMCPMC6486396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.